Constitutions and the Metropolis

Literature Cited

1. Atkin v. Kansas 191 U.S. 207 1903.
2. Audretsch D, Link A, Walshok Meds 2015. The Oxford Handbook of Local Competitiveness New York: Oxford Univ. Press
   [Google Scholar]
3. Aust H. 2019. The shifting role of cities in the global climate change regime: From Paris to Pittsburgh and back. Rev. Eur. Comp. Int. Environ. Law 28:157–66
   [Google Scholar]
4. Barber BR. 2013. If Mayors Ruled the World: Dysfunctional Nations, Rising Cities New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
   [Google Scholar]
5. Barber NW. 2018. The Principles of Constitutionalism New York: Oxford Univ. Press
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bauböck R. 2003. Reinventing urban citizenship. Citizensh. Stud. 7:2139–60
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bauder H. 2012. Jus Domicile: in pursuit of a citizenship of equality and social justice. J. Int. Political Theory 8:1–2184–96
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bishop B. 2008. The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-Minded America Is Tearing Us Apart New York: Houghton Mifflin
   [Google Scholar]
9. Blank Y. 2006. The city and the world. Columbia J. Transnatl. Law 44:3875–939
   [Google Scholar]
10. Blank Y, Rosen-Zvi I. 2018. Reviving federal regions. Stanford Law Rev 70:1895–993
    [Google Scholar]
11. Boggero G. 2017. Constitutional Principles of Local Self-Government in Europe Leiden, Neth: Brill-Nijhoff
    [Google Scholar]
12. Bookchin M. 1992. Urbanization Without Cities: The Rise and Decline of Citizenship Montreal, Can: Black Rose Books
    [Google Scholar]
13. Boone C, Wahman M. 2015. Rural bias in African electoral systems: legacies of unequal representation in African democracies. Elect. Stud. 40:335–46
    [Google Scholar]
14. Brenner N, Theodore N 2002. Spaces of Neoliberalism: Urban Restructuring in North America and Western Europe Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Brinks D, Gauri V. 2014. The law's majestic equality? The distributive impact of judicializing social and economic rights. Perspect. Politics 12:2375–93
    [Google Scholar]
16. Bumke C, Voßkuhle A. 2019. German Constitutional Law: Introduction, Cases, Principles Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
17. Cannato V. 2001. The Ungovernable City: John Lindsay and His Struggle to Save New York New York: Basic Books
    [Google Scholar]
18. Castells M. 1983. The City and the Grassroots: A Cross-Cultural Theory of Urban Social Movements Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
    [Google Scholar]
19. Chakrabarti V. 2013. A Country of Cities: A Manifesto for an Urban America New York: Metropolis Books
    [Google Scholar]
20. Clark G. 2016. Global Cities: A Short History Washington, DC: Brookings Inst. Press
    [Google Scholar]
21. Curtis S. 2016. Global Cities and Global Order Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
22. Davis MF. 2017. Design challenges for human rights cities. Columbia Hum. Rights Law Rev. 49:127–66
    [Google Scholar]
23. Davis MF. 2018. The upside of the downside: local human rights and the federalism clauses. St. Louis Univ. Law J. 62:4921–38
    [Google Scholar]
24. Davis SR. 1978. The Federal Principle: A Journey Through Time in Quest of a Meaning Berkeley/Los Angeles: Univ. Calif. Press
    [Google Scholar]
25. de Shalit A. 2018. Cities and Immigration Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
26. Elazar DJ. 1987. Exploring Federalism Tuscaloosa: Univ. Ala. Press
    [Google Scholar]
27. Fassbender B. 2018. The state's unabandoned claim to be the center of the legal universe. Int. J. Const. Law 16:41207–14
    [Google Scholar]
28. Florida R. 2002. The Rise of the Creative Class New York: Basic Books
    [Google Scholar]
29. Florida R. 2017. The New Urban Crisis: How Our Cities Are Increasing Inequality, Deepening Segregation, and Failing the Middle Class, and What We Can Do About It New York: Basic Books
    [Google Scholar]
30. Fontana D. 2017. Federal decentralization. Va. Law Rev. 104:727–95
    [Google Scholar]
31. Foster S, Iaione C. 2016. The city as a commons. Yale Law Policy Rev 34:281–349
    [Google Scholar]
32. Fraser N. 1996. Social justice in the age of identity politics: redistribution, recognition, and participation Lect., Tanner Lect. Hum. Values, Stanford Univ Stanford, CA:
    [Google Scholar]
33. Fraser N, Honneth A. 2004. Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange London/New York: Verso
    [Google Scholar]
34. Frazier M. 2019. The Power of Place: Contentious Politics in Twentieth-Century Shanghai and Bombay Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
35. Frug G. 1980. The city as a legal concept. Harvard Law Rev 93:61057–154
    [Google Scholar]
36. Frug G, Barron DJ. 2008. City Bound: How States Stifle Urban Innovation Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
37. Gerken H. 2010. Foreword: federalism all the way down. Harvard Law Rev 124:16–74
    [Google Scholar]
38. Gerken H, Revesz J. 2017. Progressive federalism: a user's guide. Democracy Spring. https://democracyjournal.org/magazine/44/progressive-federalism-a-users-guide/
    [Google Scholar]
39. Glaeser E. 2011. Triumph of the City: How Our Greatest Invention Makes Us Richer, Smarter, Greener, Healthier, and Happier New York: Penguin
    [Google Scholar]
40. Goldsmith M. 2012. Cities in intergovernmental systems. Oxford Handbook of Urban Politics P John, K Mossberger, SE Clarke 133–51 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
41. Gould R. 1995. Insurgent Identities: Class, Community and Protest in Paris from 1848 to the Commune Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
42. Grigolo M. 2019. The Human Rights City: New York, San Francisco, Barcelona Abingdon, UK/New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
43. Hartog H. 1983. Public Property and Private Power: The Corporation of the City of New York in American Law, 1730–1870 Chapel Hill: Univ. N.C. Press
    [Google Scholar]
44. Harvey D. 2003. The right to the city. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 27:4939–41
    [Google Scholar]
45. Harvey D. 2012. Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution London/New York: Verso
    [Google Scholar]
46. Himsworth C. 2015. The European Charter of Local Self-Government: A Treaty for Local Democracy Edinburgh: Edinb. Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
47. Hirschl R. 2020. City, State: Constitutionalism and the Megacity New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
48. Hirschl R, Shachar A. 2019. Spatial statism. Internatl. J. Const. Law. 17:2387–438
    [Google Scholar]
49. Hooghe L, Marks G. 2001. Multi-Level Governance and European Integration Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
    [Google Scholar]
50. Hoornweg D, Pope K. 2017. Population predictions for the world's largest cities in the 21st century. Environ. Urban. 29:1195–216
    [Google Scholar]
51. Hughes S, Chu E, Mason S 2018. Climate Change in Cities: Innovations in Multilevel Governance Cham, Switz: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
52. Hunter v. City of Pittsburgh 207 U.S 161 1907.
53. Jacobs J. 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities New York: Random House
    [Google Scholar]
54. Jung C, Hirschl R, Rosevear E 2015. Economic and social rights in national constitutions. Am. J. Comp. Law 62:41043–94
    [Google Scholar]
55. Kalb J. 2017. The state of the city and the future of human rights: a review of global urban justice. Columbia Hum. Rights Law Rev. 48:375–97
    [Google Scholar]
56. Katz B, Bradley J. 2013. The Metropolitan Revolution: How Cities and Metros Are Fixing Our Broken Politics and Fragile Economy Washington, DC: Brookings Inst. Press. Repr. ed.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Katz B, Nowak J. 2018. The New Localism: How Cities Can Thrive in the Age of Populism Washington, DC: Brookings Inst. Press
    [Google Scholar]
58. King L. 2014. Cities, subsidiarity and federalism. Federalism and Subsidiarity: NOMOS LV JE Fleming, JT Levy 291–331 New York: N.Y.U. Press
    [Google Scholar]
59. Kirchmair L. 2015. International law and public administration: the European Charter of Local Self-Government. Pro Publico Bono 3:124–35
    [Google Scholar]
60. Kohn M. 2016. The Death and Life of the Urban Commonwealth New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
61. Krugman P, Masahisa F. 2000. A monopolistic competition model of urban systems and trade. Economics of Cities: Theoretical Perspectives JM Huriot, JF Thisse 167–216 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
62. Lefebvre H. 1996. 1968. Le droit à la ville Paris: Ed. Anthropos [Translated into English as Lefebvre H. 1996. The right to the city. In Writings on Cities, ed. E Kofman, E Lebas, pp. 63–184. Oxford, UK: Blackwell]
    [Google Scholar]
63. Le Galès P. 2002. European Cities: Social Conflicts and Governance New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
64. Levy JT. 2007. Federalism, liberalism and the separation of loyalties. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 101:3459–77
    [Google Scholar]
65. Lin J. 2018. Governing Climate Change: Global Cities and Transnational Lawmaking Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
66. Loughlin M. 2018. The state: condition sine qua non. Internatl. J. Const. Law 16:41156–63
    [Google Scholar]
67. Marcuse P. 2009. From critical urban theory to the right to the city. City 13:2185–97
    [Google Scholar]
68. Mayer M. 2009. The ‘Right to the City’ in the context of shifting mottos of urban social movements. City 13:2–3362–74
    [Google Scholar]
69. Mitchell D. 2003. The Right to the City: Social Justice and the Fight for Public Space New York: Guilford
    [Google Scholar]
70. North DC, Thomas RP. 1973. The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
71. North DC, Weingast B. 1989. Constitutions and commitment: the evolution of institutions governing public choice in seventeenth-century England. J. Econ. Hist. 49:4803–32
    [Google Scholar]
72. Ogorzalek T. 2018. The Cities on the Hill: How Urban Institutions Transformed National Politics New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
73. Oomen B. 2018. Human rights cities: the politics of bringing human rights home to the local level. Mobilising International Law for ‘Global Justiceed J Handmaker, K Arts 208–32 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
74. Oomen B, Davis MF, Grigolo M 2016. Global Urban Justice: The Rise of Human Rights Cities Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
75. O'Sullivan A. 2018. Urban Economics New York: McGraw Hill/Irwin, 9th ed..
    [Google Scholar]
76. Palermo F, Kössler K. 2017. Comparative Federalism: Constitutional Arrangements and Case Law Oxford, UK/Portland, OR: Hart Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Peterson PE. 1981. City Limits Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
78. Pieterse M. 2017. Rights-Based Litigation, Urban Governance and Social Justice in South Africa: The Right to Joburg Abingdon, UK/New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
79. Prak M. 2018. Citizens Without Nations: Urban Citizenship in Europe and the World, c.1000–1789 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
80. Pritchett WE. 2017. City power in a new era of localism. Fordham Urb. Law J. 44:1449–61
    [Google Scholar]
81. Purcell M. 2004. Globalization, urban enfranchisement, and the right to the city: towards an urban politics of the inhabitant. Rights to the City, Vol. III. Home of Geography Publication Series D Wastl-Walter, L Staeheli, L Dowler 11–24 Rome: Soc. Geogr. Ital.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Purcell M. 2014. Possible worlds: Henri Lefebvre and the right to the city. J. Urb. Aff. 36:1141–54
    [Google Scholar]
83. Rajan R. 2019. The Third Pillar: How Markets and the State Leave the Community Behind New York: Penguin
    [Google Scholar]
84. Rapport M. 2017. The Unruly City: Paris, London and New York in the Age of Revolution New York: Basic Books
    [Google Scholar]
85. Reference re Secession of Quebec( 1998. 2 S.C.R. 217 (Can.)
86. Rodden J. 2010. The geographic distribution of political preferences. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 13:321–40
    [Google Scholar]
87. Rodden J. 2019. Why Cities Lose: The Deep Roots of the Urban-Rural Divide New York: Basic Books
    [Google Scholar]
88. Rosenfeld M, Sajó A 2012. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
89. Rosevear E, Hirschl R, Jung C 2019. Justiciable and aspirational social rights in national constitutions. The Future of Economic and Social Rights K Young 37–65 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
90. Rucho v. Common Cause No. 18–422, 588 U.S.__(2019)
91. Samet RH. 2013. Complexity, the science of cities and long-range futures. Futures 47:49–58
    [Google Scholar]
92. Sancton A, Young RA 2009. Foundations of Governance: Municipal Government in Canada's Provinces Toronto, Can: Univ. Tor. Press
    [Google Scholar]
93. Sansom G, Dawkins J. 2013. Australia: Perth and South East Queensland. Governance and Finance of Large Metropolitan Areas in Federal Systems E Slack, R Chattopadhyay pp. 10–48 Toronto, Can.: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
94. Sassen S. 2001. The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
95. Saunders C. 2005. Constitutional recognition of local government in Australia. The Place and Role of Local Government in Federal Systems N Steytler 47–63 Johannesburg: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung
    [Google Scholar]
96. Scharff E. 2016. Powerful cities? Limits on municipal taxing authority and what to do about them. N.Y. Univ. Law Rev. 91:2292–343
    [Google Scholar]
97. Scharff E. 2018. Hyper preemption: A reordering of the state-local relationship. Georgetown Law J 106:51469–522
    [Google Scholar]
98. Schragger RC. 2016. City Power: Urban Governance in a Global Age New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
99. Schragger RC. 2018a. The attack on American cities. Tex. Law Rev. 96:61163–233
    [Google Scholar]
100. Schragger RC. 2018b. When white supremacists invade a city. Va. Law Rev Online 104:58–73
     [Google Scholar]
101. Scott JC. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
102. Soohoo C. 2016. Human rights cities: challenges and possibilities. Global Urban Justice: The Rise of Human Rights Cities B Oomen, MF Davis, M Grigolo 257–75 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
103. Spruyt H. 1994. The Sovereign State and Its Competitors Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
104. Stahl K. 2017. Preemption, federalism and local democracy. Fordham Urban Law J 44:133–79
     [Google Scholar]
105. Stahl K. 2020. Local Citizenship in a Global Age New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
106. Stasavage D. 2014. Was Weber right? The role of urban autonomy in Europe's rise. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 108:2337–54
     [Google Scholar]
107. Stone C, Stoker R 2015. Urban Neighborhoods in a New Era: Revitalizing Politics in the Post-Industrial City Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
108. Swiney CF, Foster S. 2019. Cities are rising in influence and power on the global stage. City Lab April 15. https://www.citylab.com/perspective/2019/04/city-leadership-international-policy-mayors-u20-uclg-c40/587089/
     [Google Scholar]
109. Taylor PJ. 2004. World City Network: A Global Urban Analysis London/New York: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
110. Tierney S. 2018. Federalism and constitutional theory. Comparative Constitutional Theory, ed. G Jacobsohn, M Schor 45–65 Cheltenham/Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar Publ.
     [Google Scholar]
111. Tilly C. 1992. Coercion, Capital and European States, AD 990–1992 Malden/Oxford, UK: Blackwell
     [Google Scholar]
112. Vertovec S. 2007. Super-diversity and its implications. Ethn. Racial Stud. 30:61024–54
     [Google Scholar]
113. Walker N, Mac Amhlaigh C, Michelon C 2018. Law, polity and the legacy of statehood: an introduction. Internatl. J. Const. Law 16:41148–55
     [Google Scholar]
114. Weinstock D. 2014. Cities and federalism. Federalism and Subsidiarity: NOMOS LV JE Fleming, JT Levy 259–90 New York: N.Y.U. Press
     [Google Scholar]
115. Wyman K, Spiegel-Feld D. 2020. The urban environmental renaissance. Calif. Law Rev. 108:2305–77
     [Google Scholar]
116. Zielonka J. 2014. Is the EU Doomed? Cambridge, UK: Polity
     [Google Scholar]