1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Law and Social Science
  4. Volume 14, 2018
  5. Article

Annual Review of Law and Social Science

Volume 14, 2018

Law's Underdog: A Call for More-than-Human Legalities

Abstract

Questions pertaining to the role of nonhumans in law shed light on some of the most fundamental assumptions and constructions of contemporary modern law. I start by reviewing the traditions of animal welfare and animal rights in legal studies and by discussing the constitutional frameworks that contend with the animal. Then, I move beyond the individual-based discourse of much existing animal law to contemplate ecological traditions that consider nonhuman populations and species as well as land ethics and ecosystem management. Next, I review the rich literature that has emerged in the last two decades in critical theory, mainly posthumanism and its subtraditions of animal geographies and multispecies ethnography. Finally, I sketch visions of more-than-human legalities that push beyond the limitations of existing (neo)liberal legal traditions, pausing to consider what ocean, or blue, legalities might look like. Throughout, I argue that we need to move toward a dynamic and pluralistic approach that acknowledges the myriad ways of being in the world, their significance to law, and, in turn, law's significance to these other modes of existence.

Keyword(s): animal geographies, animal law, blue legalities, legal pluralism, more-than-human legalities, multispecies ethnography, nonhumans, posthumanism
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101317-030820
2018-10-13
2024-07-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lawsocsci/14/1/annurev-lawsocsci-101317-030820.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101317-030820&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Adams WA 2009. Human subjects and animal objects: animals as “other” in the law. J. Anim. Law Ethics 3:29–51
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Agamben G 2004. The Open: Man and Animal Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Badmington N 2000. Posthumanism New York: Palgrave
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bekoff M 2013. Ignoring Nature No More: The Case for Compassionate Conservation Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bentham J 1988 (1789). The Principles of Morals and Legislation Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bevilaqua CB 2013. Chimpanzees in court: What difference does it make. Law and the Question of the Animal: A Critical Jurisprudence Y Otomo, E Mussawir 71–88 New York: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bookchin M 1980. Toward an Ecological Society Montreal: Black Rose Books
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bookchin M 2000. What is social ecology. Earth Ethics: Introductory Readings on Animal Rights J Sterba 225–39 Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. , 2nd ed..
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Braun B 2005. Environmental issues: writing a more-than-human urban geography. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 29:635–50
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Braverman I 2008. Governing certain things: the regulation of street trees in four North American cities. Tulane Environ. Law J. 22:135–60
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Braverman I 2010. Governing with clean hands: automated public toilets and sanitary surveillance. Surveill. Soc. 8:11–27
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Braverman I 2011. Civilized borders: a study of Israel's new crossing administration. Antipode 43:2264–95
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Braverman I 2012. Zooland: The Institution of Captivity Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Braverman I 2013. Animal mobilegalities: the regulation of animal movement in the American city. Humanimalia 5:1104–35
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Braverman I 2015. Wild Life: The Institution of Nature Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Braverman I 2016. Animals, Biopolitics, Law: Lively Legalities London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Braverman I 2017. Captive: zoometric operations in Gaza. Public Cult 29:1191–215
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Braverman I 2018. Coral Whisperers: Scientists on the Brink Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Braverman I, Johnson E 2019. Ocean Legalities: The Law and Life of the Sea Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press Manuscript in review
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Brulliard K 2017.a Chimpanzees are animals. But are they “persons”. Washington Post March 16. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/animalia/wp/2017/03/16/chimpanzees-are-animals-but-are-they-persons/?utm_term=.da09594e351a
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Brulliard K 2017.b Chimpanzees are not “persons,” appeals court says. Washington Post June 10. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/animalia/wp/2017/06/10/chimpanzees-are-not-persons-appeals-court-says/?utm_term=.843bd18b2db3
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Buller H 2014. Animal geographies I. Prog. Hum. Geogr 38:2308–18
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Buller H 2015. Animal geographies II: methods. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 39:3374–84
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Callicott JB 1980. Animal liberation: a triangular affair. Environ. Ethics 2:4311–38
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Cavalieri P 2001. The Animal Question: Why Nonhuman Animals Deserve Human Rights New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Cavalieri P, Singer P 1994. The Great Ape Project: Equality Beyond Humanity New York: St. Martin's
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Dayan C 2011. The Law Is a White Dog: How Legal Rituals Make and Unmake Persons Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Deckha M 2008. Intersectionality and posthumanist visions of equality. Wis. J. Law Gend. Soc. 23:249–67
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Deckha M 2013. Initiating a non-anthropocentric jurisprudence: the rule of law and animal vulnerability under a property paradigm. Alberta Law Rev 50:4783–814
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Delaney D 2003. Law and Nature Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Derrida J 2008. The Animal That Therefore I Am New York: Fordham Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Derrida J 2009. The Beast and the Sovereign I Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Donaldson S, Kymlicka W 2011. Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Donovan J, Adams CJ 1996. Beyond Animal Rights: A Feminist Caring Ethic for the Treatment of Animals New York: Continuum
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Eisen J 2017. Animals in the constitutional state Presented to JHI Animals in the Law and Humanities Working Group Toronto:
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Favre D 2000. Equitable self-ownership for animals. Duke Law J 50:473–502
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Fernandez A 2009. Pierson v. Post: a great debate, James Kent, and the project of building a learned law for New York State. Law Soc. Inq. 34:2301–36
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Fetissenko M 2011. Beyond morality: developing a new rhetorical strategy for the animal rights movement. J. Anim. Ethics 1:2150–75
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Foucault M 1975. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison New York: Random House
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Foucault M 1990. The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1: An Introduction New York: Vintage
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Foucault M 2007. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–78 Houndmills, UK: Palgrave MacMillan
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Francione G 1995. Animals, Property and the Law Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Francione G 1996. Rain Without Thunder: The Ideology of the Animal Rights Movement Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Francione G, Charlton A 2015. Animal Rights: The Abolitionist Approach Exempla
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Francione G, Garner R 2010. The Animal Rights Debate: Abolition or Regulation New York: Columbia Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Gillespie K 2016. Nonhuman animal resistance and the improprieties of live property. See Braverman 2016 117–34
  47. Gillis JR 2013. The blue humanities. Humanities 34:3 https://www.neh.gov/humanities/2013/mayjune/feature/the-blue-humanities
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Gorman J 2012. Animal studies cross campus to lecture hall. New York Times Jan. 3 http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/03/science/animal-studies-move-from-the-lab-to-the-lecture-hall.html
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Gruen L 2017. The Promise and Perils of Non-Human Personhood unpublished paper (cited with permission)
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Haraway D 1991. A cyborg manifesto: science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women149–81 New York: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Haraway D 2008. When Species Meet Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Haslam N, Loughnan S 2014. Dehumanization and infrahumanization. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 65:1399–423
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Hovorka AJ 2018.a Animal geographies II: hybridizing. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 42:3453–62
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Hovorka AJ 2018.b Animal geographies III: species relations of power. Prog. Hum. Geogr. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Jasanoff S 1996. Science at the Bar: Law, Science, and Technology in America Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Kirksey SE, Helmreich S 2010. The emergence of multispecies ethnography. Cult. Anthropol. 25:545–76
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Klein R 1995. The power of pets. The New Republic July 9. https://newrepublic.com/article/90872/dog-cat-pet-america
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Latour B 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Latour B 1993. We Have Never Been Modern Birmingham, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Latour B 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Latour B 2009. The Making of Law: An Ethnography of the Conseil d'Etat Cambridge, UK: Polity
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Leopold A 1949. A Sand County Almanac: And Sketches Here and There Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Levesque S 2016. Two versions of ecosophy: Arne Nass, Felix Guattari, and their connection with semiotics. Sign Syst. Stud. 44:4511–41
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Lorimer J 2007. Nonhuman charisma. Environ. Plann. D 25:5911–32
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Lovvorn J 2016. Climate change beyond environmentalism part I: intersectional threats and the case for collective action. Georgetown Environ. Law Rev. 29:1–67
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Margil M 2018. Our laws make slaves of nature. It's not just humans who need rights. The Guardian May 23. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/may/23/laws-slaves-nature-humans-rights-environment-amazon
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Mawani R 2016. Law, settler colonialism, and “the forgotten space” of maritime worlds. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 12:107–31
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Michael M 2004. Roadkill: between humans, nonhuman animals, and technologies. Soc. Anim. 12:4277–98
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Minteer BA, Collins JP 2017. Ecological ethics in captivity: balancing values and responsibilities in zoo and aquarium research under rapid global change. The Animal Ethics Reader SJ Armstrong, RG Botzler 594–608 New York: Routledge, 3rd ed..
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Otomo Y, Mussawir E 2013. Law and the Question of the Animal: A Critical Jurisprudence New York: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Paquet PC, Darimont CT 2010. Wildlife conservation and animal welfare: Two sides of the same coin. Anim. Welfare 19:177–90
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos A 2013. The normativity of an animal atmosphere. Law and the Question of the Animal: A Critical Jurisprudence Y Ottomo, E Mussawir 149–65 New York: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos A 2016. Lively agency: life and law in the anthropocene. See Braverman 2016 193–209
  74. Raha R 2006. Animal liberation: an interview with Professor Peter Singer. The Vegan Autumn 18–19 https://issuu.com/vegan_society/docs/the-vegan-autumn-2006
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Riles A 2006. Documents: Artifacts of Modern Knowledge Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Regan T 1983. The Case for Animal Rights Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Regan T 2004. Empty Cages: Facing the Challenge of Animal Rights Oxford, UK: Rowman & Littlefield
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Shukin N 2009. Animal Capital: Rendering Life in Biopolitical Times Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Singer P 1990. Animal Liberation New York: New York Rev. Books/Random House. Rev. ed.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Singer P 2003. Animal liberation at 30. New York Review of Books May 15. http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2003/05/15/animal-liberation-at-30/
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Singer P 2009. Speciesism and moral status. Metaphilosophy 40:3–4567–81
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Steiner G 2007. Cosmic holism and obligations toward animals: a challenge to classical liberalism. J. Anim. Law Ethics 2:11–20
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Stroud E 2018. Law and the dead body: Is a corpse a person or a thing. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 14:115–25
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Svärd P-A 2011. Beyond welfarist morality: an abolitionist reply to Fetissenko. J. Anim. Ethics 1:2176–86
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Swedlow B 2009. Reason for hope? The spotted owl injunctions and policy change. Law Soc. Inq. 34:4825–67
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Tsing A 2012. Unruly edges: mushrooms as companion species. Environ. Humanit. 1:141–54
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Varner G 2012. Personhood, Ethics, and Animal Cognition: Situating Animals in Hare's Two Level Utilitarianism New York: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Waldau P 2011. Animal welfare and conservation: an essential connection. Minding Nat 4:112–16
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Weil K 2012. Thinking Animals: Why Animal Studies Now? New York: Columbia Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Whatmore S 2006. Materialist returns: practicing cultural geographies in and for a more-than-human world. Cult. Geogr. 13:4600–10
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Wheeler W, Williams L 2012. The animal turn. New Front 76:5–7
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Wise S 2000. Rattling the Cage: Toward Legal Rights for Animals New York: Perseus
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Wise S 2004. Animal rights, one step at a time. Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions C Sunstein, M Nussbaum 19–50 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Wise S 2018. Letter #1 from the front lines of the struggle for nonhuman rights: the first 50 months. Medium Jan. 29. https://medium.com/@NonhumanRights/letter-1-from-the-front-lines-of-the-nonhuman-rights-projects-struggle-for-the-rights-of-nonhuman-b053b100af25
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Wolfe C 1998. Critical Environments: Postmodern Theory and the Pragmatics of the “Outside.” Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Wolfe C 2003. Animal Rites: American Culture, The Discourse of Species, and Posthumanist Theory Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Wolfe C 2009. What Is Posthumanism? Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Wolfe C 2013. Before the Law: Humans and Other Animals in a Biopolitical Frame Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Young KM 2014. Everyone knows the game: legal consciousness in the Hawaiian cockfight. Law Soc. Rev. 48:3499–530
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101317-030820
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error