1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Law and Social Science
  4. Volume 16, 2020
  5. Article

Annual Review of Law and Social Science

Volume 16, 2020

Conversations in Law and Society: Oral Histories of the Emergence and Transformation of the Movement

Abstract

This article uses oral histories of surviving founders to explore the emergence of law and society as a scholarly movement and its transformation to a scholarly field. The oral histories we draw on come from a unique public archive of interviews with founders of law and society titled Conversations in Law and Society, which is maintained by the Center for the Study of Law & Society (CSLS) at the University of California, Berkeley. We supplement and triangulate the CSLS oral histories with published sources that recount the history of law and society research. Our discussion begins with a brief review of the oral history approach and how the CSLS archive was constructed. We draw on the social movements literature to trace the emergence of the law and society field as a scholarly movement, showing how the movement drew strength from the political opportunities of the 1960s and 1970s; the mobilizing structures through which scholars created space for research and training; and the framing processes that crystallized the meanings, identities, and sentiments of the movement. We then present the founders’ perspectives on the characteristics of law and society as it became a scholarly field.While never becoming institutionalized as a discipline in the academy, law and society nonetheless spawned other scholarly movements and continues to influence research and teaching in social science disciplines and in law schools.

Keyword(s): institutionalized fields, law and society, oral history, scholarly movements
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042824
2020-10-13
2024-07-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lawsocsci/16/1/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042824.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042824&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abel RL. 2010. Law and society: project and practice. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 6:1–23
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Amherst Seminar 1988. From the special issue editors. Law Soc. Rev. 22:629–36
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Black D. 1976. The Behavior of Law New York: Academic
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Black D. 1980. The Manners and Customs of the Police New York: Academic
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown v. Board of Education 347 U.S. 483 1954.
  6. Buchanan R, Trubek LG 1991–1992. Resistances and possibilities: a critical and practical look at public interest lawyering. N.Y. Univ. Rev. Law Soc. Change 19:687–720
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Calavita K. 1992. Inside the State: The Bracero Program, Immigration, and the INS New York: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Calavita K. 2016. 2010. Invitation to Law and Society: An Introduction to the Study of Real Law Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 2nd ed..
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Carbado DW, Roithmayr D. 2014. Critical race theory meets social science. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 10:149–67
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Chua LJ, Engel DM. 2019. Legal consciousness reconsidered. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 15:335–53
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Comaroff J, Comaroff J. 1991. Of Revelation and Revolution: Christianity, Colonialism and Consciousness in South Africa 1: Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Comaroff J, Comaroff J. 1992. Ethnography and the Historical Imagination Boulder, CO: Westview
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Cotterrell R. 2004. Selznick interviewed: Philip Selznick in conversation with Roger Cotterrell. J. Law Soc. 31:291–317
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Delgado R. 1982. Words that wound: a tort action for racial insults, epithets, and name-calling. Harvard Civil-Rights Law Rev 17:133–81
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Delgado R. 1995. The Rodrigo Chronicles: Conversations about America and Race New York: N.Y. Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Delgado R, Stefancic J. 2001. Critical Race Theory: An Introduction New York: N.Y. Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Diamond SS. 1997. Illuminations and shadows from jury simulations. Law Hum. Behav. 21:561–71
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Edelman LB, Smyth AC, Rahim A 2016. Legal discrimination: empirical sociolegal and critical race perspectives on antidiscrimination law. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 12:395–415
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Erlanger HS. 2005. Organizations, institutions, and the story of Shmuel: reflections on the 40th anniversary of the Law and Society Association. Law Soc. Rev. 39:1–10
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Ewick P, Silbey SS. 1998. The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Feeley MM. 1979. The Process Is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Criminal Court New York: Russell Sage Found.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Feeley MM, Simon JS. 1992. The new penology: notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications. Criminology 30:449–74
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Felstiner WLF, Abel RL, Sarat A 1980–1981. The emergence and transformation of disputes: naming, blaming, claiming.…. Law Soc. Rev. 15:631–54
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Frickel S, Gross N. 2005. A general theory of scientific/intellectual movements. Am. Soc. Rev. 70:204–32
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Friedman LM. 1973. A History of American Law New York: Simon & Schuster
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Friedman LM. 1977. Law and Society: An Introduction Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Friedman LM. 1986. The law & society movement. Stanford Law Rev 38:763–80
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Friedman LM. 2005. Coming of age: law and society enters an exclusive club. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 1:1–16
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Friedman LM, Macaulay S. 1969. Law and the Behavioral Sciences Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Galanter M. 1974. Why the “haves” come out ahead: speculations on the limits of legal change. Law Soc. Rev. 9:95–160
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Galanter M. 1981. Justice in many rooms: courts, private ordering and indigenous law. J. Leg. Plur. Unoff. Law 13:1–47
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Galanter M, Palay T. 1991. Tournament of Lawyers: The Transformation of the Big Law Firm Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Garth B, Sterling J. 1998. From legal realism to law and society: reshaping law for the last stages of the social activist state. Law Soc. Rev. 32:409–72
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Gómez LE. 2004. A tale of two genres: on the real and ideal links between law and society and critical race theory. Blackwell Companion to Law and Society A Sarat 453–70 Oxford, UK: Blackwell
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Gubrium JF, Holstein JA. 2012. Narrative practice and the transformation of interview subjectivity. The SAGE Handbook of Interview Research: The Complexity of the Craft JF Gubrium, JA Holstein, AB Marvasti, KD McKinney 27–44 Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 2nd ed..
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Gusfield JR. 1963. Symbolic Crusade: Status Politics and the American Temperance Movement Urbana: Univ. Ill. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Gusfield JR. 1981. The Culture of Public Problems: Drinking-Driving and the Symbolic Order Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Halliday S, Schmidt P. 2009. Conducting Law and Society Research: Reflections on Methods and Practices Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Haney López I 2007a. Race, Law and Society Burlington, VT: Ashgate
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Haney López I. 2007b. Introduction. In Race, Law and Society IH López xi–xxii Burlington, VT: Ashgate
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Hans VP, Vidmar N. 2001. 1986. Judging the Jury New York: Plenum
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Holstein JA, Gubrium JF. 2000. 1990. Constructing the Life Course Lanham, MD: General Hall, 2nd ed..
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Jacobs JA. 2014. In Defense of Disciplines: Interdisciplinarity and Specialization in the Research University Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Kadish MR, Kadish SH. 1973. Discretion to Disobey: A Study of Lawful Departures from Legal Rules Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Kagan RA. 1989. Editor's introduction: understanding regulatory enforcement. Law Policy 11:89–119
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Kagan RA. 2001. Adversarial Legalism: The American Way of Law Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Kanter A. 2011. The law: What's disability studies got to do with it or an introduction to disability legal studies. . Columbia Hum. Rights Law Rev. 42:403–79
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Koehler J. 2015. Development and fracture of a discipline: legacies of the school of criminology at Berkeley. Criminology 53:513–44
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Krygier M. 2012. Philip Selznick: Ideals in the World Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Larson E, Schmidt P 2014. The Law & Society Reader II New York: N.Y. Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Laub JH. 1984. Talking about crime: oral history in criminology and criminal justice. Oral Hist. Rev. 12:29–42
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Leiter B. 2005. American legal realism. The Blackwell Guide to Legal Philosophy and Legal Theory W Edmundson, M Golding 50–66 Oxford, UK: Blackwell
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Levine FJ. 1990. Goose bumps and “the search for signs of intelligent life” in sociolegal studies: after twenty-five years. Law Soc. Rev. 24:7–34
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Lippman M. 2017. Law and Society Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 2nd ed..
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Macaulay S. 1963. Non-contractual relations in business: a preliminary study. Am. Sociol. Rev. 28:55–67
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Macaulay S. 1984. Law and the behavioral sciences: Is there any there there. Law Policy 6:149–87
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Macaulay S, Friedman L, Mertz E 2007. Law in Action: A Socio-Legal Reader St. Paul, MN: Foundation
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Macfarlane A, Harrison S, Turin M 2005. Anthropological and other ancestors: notes on setting up a visual archive of the discipline. Anthropol. News 46:21–22
     [Google Scholar]
  59. McAdam D, McCarthy JD, Zald MN 1996. Introduction: political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and framing processes—toward a synthetic, comparative perspective on social movements. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, Framing Processes D McAdam, JD McCarthy, MN Zald 1–22 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Merry SE. 1981. Urban Danger: Life in a Neighborhood of Strangers Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Merry SE. 1990. Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness among Working-Class Americans Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Merry SE. 2005. Human Rights & Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 1966.
  64. Moore SF. 1958. Power and Property in Inca Peru New York: Columbia Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Moore SF. 1978. Law as Process: An Anthropological Approach London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Moore SF. 1986. Social Facts and Fabrications: “Customary” Law on Kilimanjaro, 1880–1980 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Morrill C, Edelman LB. 2020. Sociology of law and the new legal realism. Research Handbook on Modern Legal Realism See Talesh et al. 2020
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Morrill C, Mayo K. 2015. Charting the “classics” in law and society: the development of the field over the past half-century. The Handbook of Law and Society A Sarat, P Ewick 18–36 Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Muir WK. 1973. Law and Attitude Change Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Muir WK. 1977. Police: Streetcorner Politicians Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Nader L. 1980. No Access to Law: Alternatives to the American Judicial System New York: Academic
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Nader L. 1990. Harmony Ideology: Justice and Control in a Zapotec Mountain Village Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Nader L, Todd HF 1978. The Disputing Process—Law in Ten Societies New York: Columbia Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Obasogie OK. 2007. Race in law and society: a critique. Race, Law and Society IH López 445–64 Burlington, VT: Ashgate
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Sarat A. 1990. “…The law is all over”: power, resistance and the legal consciousness of the welfare poor. Yale J. Law Hum. 2:343–79
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Sarat A 2004a. The Social Organization of Law: Introductory Readings Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Sarat A 2004b. The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society Oxford, UK: Blackwell
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Sarat A, Constable M, Engel D, Hans V, Lawrence S 1998. The concept of boundaries in the practices and products of sociolegal scholarship: an introduction. Crossing Boundaries: Traditions and Transformations in Law and Society Research A Sarat, M Constable, D Engel, VP Hans, S Lawrence 1–17 Evanston, IL: Northwest. Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Sarat A, Ewick P 2015. The Handbook of Law and Society Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Sarat A, Silbey SS. 1988. The pull of the policy audience. Law Policy 10:97–166
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Savelsberg J, Halliday T, Liu S, Morrill C, Seron C, Silbey SS 2016. Law & Society Review at fifty: a debate on the future of publishing by the Law & Society Association. Law. Soc. Rev. 50:1017–36
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Scheiber HN. 1973. Property law, expropriation, and resource allocation by government: the United States, 1789–1910. J. Econ. Hist. 33:232–51
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Scheiber HN. 1975. Federalism and the American economic order, 1789–1910. Law Soc. Rev. 10:57–118
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Schwartz RD. 1954. Social factors in the development of legal control: a case study of two Israeli settlements. Yale Law J 63:471–91
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Schwartz RD, Skolnick JH. 1962. Two studies of legal stigma. Soc. Probl. 10:133–42
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Selznick P. 1949. TVA and the Grassroots: A Study in the Politics of Organization Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Selznick P. 1969. Law, Society and Industrial Justice New York: Russell Sage
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Selznick P. 1980. Jurisprudence and social policy: aspirations and perspectives. Calif. Law Rev. 68:206–20
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Seron C. 2010. Forward to special issue on law, race and inequality. Law Soc. Rev. 44:419–30
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Seron C, Coutin SB, White Meeusen P 2013. Is there a canon of law and society. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 9:287–306
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Seron C, Silbey SS. 2004. Profession, science, and culture: an emergent canon of law and society research. Blackwell Companion to Law and Society A Sarat 30–60 Oxford, UK: Blackwell
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Silbey SS. 1980–1981. Case processing: consumer protection in an attorney general's office. Law Soc. Rev. 15:849–82
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Silbey SS. 2000. From the editor. Law Soc. Rev. 34:859–72
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Silbey SS. 2005. After legal consciousness. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 1:323–68
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Skolnick JH. 1965. The sociology of law in America: overview and trends. Soc. Probl. 13:4–39
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Skolnick JH. 1966. Justice Without Trial: Law Enforcement in a Democratic Society New York: Wiley
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Talesh S, Klug H, Mertz E 2020. Research Handbook on Modern Legal Realism Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. In press
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Tapp JL, Kohlberg L. 1971. Developing senses of law and legal justice. J. Soc. Issues 27:65–91
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Tapp JL, Levine FJ. 1977. Law, Justice, and the Individual in Society: Psychological and Legal Issues New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Tejani R. 2019. Law & Society Today Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Trubek DM. 1972a. Toward a social theory of law: an essay on the study of law and development. Yale Law J 82:1–50
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Trubek DM. 1972b. Max Weber and the rise of capitalism. Wis. Law Rev. 1972:720–53
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Trubek DM. 1990. Back to the future: the short happy life of the law and society movement. Fla. State Univ. Law Rev. 18:4–55
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Trubek DM, Galanter M. 1974. Scholars in self-estrangement: some reflections on the crisis in law and development studies in the United States. Wis. Law Rev. 1974:1062–102
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Tyler TR. 2006. 1990. Why People Obey the Law New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Vago S, Barkan SE. 2018. 1981. Law & Society New York: Routledge, 11th ed..
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Vidmar N, Ellsworth P. 1974. Public opinion and the death penalty. Stanford Law Rev 26:1245–70
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Walsh A, Hemmens C. 2019. Law, Justice, and Society: A Sociolegal Introduction Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Zeisel H, Diamond SS. 1978. The effect of peremptory challenges on jury and verdict: an experiment in a federal district court. Stanford Law Rev 30:491–531
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042824
Loading
Conversations in Law and Society: Oral Histories of the Emergence and Transformation of the Movement
Annual Review of Law and Social Science 16, 97 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042824
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042824
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042824
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error