
Full text loading...
We use cookies to track usage and preferences.I Understand
Lake Michigan, a 58,000-km2 freshwater inland sea, is large enough to have persistent basin-scale circulation yet small enough to enable development of approximately balanced budgets for water, energy, and elements including carbon and silicon. Introduction of nonindigenous species—whether through invasion, intentional stocking, or accidental transplantation—has transformed the lake's ecosystem function and habitat structure. Of the 79 nonindigenous species known to have established reproductive populations in the lake, only a few have brought considerable ecological pressure to bear. Four of these were chosen for this review to exemplify top-down (sea lamprey, Petromyzon marinus), middle-out (alewife, Alosa pseudoharengus), and bottom-up (the dreissenid zebra and quagga mussels, Dreissena polymorpha and Dreissena rostriformis bugensis, respectively) transformations of Lake Michigan ecology, habitability, and ultimately physical environment. Lampreys attacked and extirpated indigenous lake trout, the top predator. Alewives outcompeted native planktivorous fish and curtailed invertebrate populations. Dreissenid mussels—especially quagga mussels, which have had a much greater impact than the preceding zebra mussels—moved ecosystem metabolism basin-wide from water column to bottom dominance and engineered structures throughout the lake. Each of these nonindigenous species exerted devastating effects on commercial and sport fisheries through ecosystem structure modification.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Data & Media loading...
Download Supplemental Table 1: Non-indigenous species established in Lake Michigan, 1871-2011 (PDF).
Supplemental Video 1: Corresponds to Figure 3a, 3c, and 3d. Coastal stations (C-depth) begin at C-10 m, where quagga mussel (QM)-encrusted rocks were surrounded by a carpet of empty shells from dead zebra mussels (ZM). Light growth of the filamentous alga Cladophora sp. is evident on rocks.
Supplemental Video 2: Corresponds to Figure 3b. A C-20 m station in 1999 shows ZM covering rocks while clay surfaces are completely bare, whereas in 2006 C-20 m includes QM on the flat clay surface as well. The small drumlin in the background is bare clay with encrusted rocks protruding.
Supplemental Video 3: Corresponds to Figure 3e and 3f. Underwater sandy beaches were characteristic of C-30 m, C-40 m, and C-50 m, with QM covering approximately 75% at 30 m and becoming a complete carpet at deeper stations. Artificial light was used for evening scenes at C-50 m only.
Supplemental Video 4: Corresponds to Figure 3g. Mid-Lake Reef Complex pinnacle station SR-40 m, 64 km offshore of Milwaukee, was covered with QM on hard rock.
Supplemental Video 5: Corresponds to Figure 3h. Two scenes from the Northeast Reef plateau 35 km offshore show QM at NE-57 m at a density of approximately 30,000 m-2 on both horizontal and vertical surfaces.
Supplemental Video 6: Corresponds to Figure 3i. Two scenes from the Northeast Reef plateau 35 km offshore show QM at NE-57 m at a density of approximately 30,000 m-2 on both horizontal and vertical surfaces.
Supplemental Video 7: Corresponds to Figure 3l. Feeding current of a QM in the laboratory.