Political Theory Rediscovers Public Administration

Literature Cited

1. Agnafors M. 2013. Quality of government: towards a more complex definition. Am. Political Sci. Rev 107:3433–45
   [Google Scholar]
2. Applbaum A. 1999. Ethics for Adversaries Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
   [Google Scholar]
3. Arendt H. 2006 (1963. Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil New York: Penguin
   [Google Scholar]
4. Badano G. 2020. The principle of restraint: public reason and the reform of public administration. Political Stud 68:1110–27
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bagg S. 2021. Fighting power with power: the administrative state as a weapon against concentrated private power. Soc. Philos. Policy 38:1220–43
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bauman Z. 1989. Modernity and the Holocaust Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bertelli A. 2021. Democracy Administered: How Public Administration Shapes Representative Government Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bevir M. 2010. Democratic Governance Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
   [Google Scholar]
9. Boswell J, Corbett J. 2018. Deliberative bureaucracy: reconciling democracy's trade-off between inclusion and economy. Political Stud 66:3618–34
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bourdieu P. 2014. On the State: Lectures at the College de France, 1989–1992 Cambridge, UK: Polity
    [Google Scholar]
11. Brodkin EZ. 2000. Investigating policy's ‘practical’ meaning: street-level research on welfare policy Work. Pap. 162 Northwestern Univ./Univ. Chicago Jt. Cent. Poverty Res. Chicago: https://ideas.repec.org/p/wop/jopovw/162.html
    [Google Scholar]
12. Brodkin EZ 2013. Street-level organizations and the welfare state. Work and the Welfare State: Street-Level Organizations and Workfare Politics EZ Brodkin, G Marston G 17–34 Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
13. Campbell AL. 2012. Policy makes mass politics. Annu. Rev. Political Sci 15:333–51
    [Google Scholar]
14. Carpenter D. 2001. The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862–1928 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
15. Carpenter D. 2010. Reputation and Power: Organizational Image and Pharmaceutical Regulation at the FDA Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
16. Carpenter D. 2020. On categories and the countability of things bureaucratic: turning from Wilson (back) to interpretation. Perspect. Public Manag. Gov 3:283–93
    [Google Scholar]
17. Ceva E, Ferretti MP 2021. Political Corruption: The Internal Enemy of Public Institutions New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
18. Christiano T 2005. Democracy and bureaucracy. Philos. Phenomenol. Res 71:1211–17
    [Google Scholar]
19. Cohen N. 2021. Policy Entrepreneurship at the Street Level: Understanding the Effect of the Individual Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
20. Considine M, Lewis JM. 2003. Bureaucracy, network, or enterprise? Comparing models of governance in Australia, Britain, the Netherlands, and New Zealand. Public Adm. Rev 63:2131–40
    [Google Scholar]
21. Cordelli C. 2020. The Privatized State Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
22. Das V 2004. The signature of the state: the paradox of illegibility. Anthropology in the Margins of the State V Das, D Poole 225–52 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
23. Du Gay P 2000. In Praise of Bureaucracy: Weber, Organization, Ethics London/Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE
    [Google Scholar]
24. Du Gay P, Vikkelsø S 2017. For Formal Organization: The Past in the Present and Future of Organization Theory Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
25. Emerson B. 2015. The democratic reconstruction of the Hegelian state in American progressive political thought. Rev. Politics 77:545–74
    [Google Scholar]
26. Emerson B. 2019. The Public's Law: Origins and Architecture of Progressive Democracy Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
27. Engster D. 2020. A public ethics of care for policy implementation. Am. J. Political Sci 64:3621–33
    [Google Scholar]
28. Ernst DR. 2014. Tocqueville's Nightmare: The Administrative State Emerges in America, 1900–1940 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
29. Evans PB, Rueschemeyer D, Skocpol T, eds. 1985. Bringing the State Back In Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
30. Fassin D, Bouagga Y, Coutant I, Eideliman J, Fernandez F et al. 2015. At the Heart of the State: The Moral World of Institutions London: Pluto
    [Google Scholar]
31. Frederickson HG. 1980. New Public Administration Tuscaloosa: Univ. Ala. Press
    [Google Scholar]
32. Fukuyama F. 2014. Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux
    [Google Scholar]
33. Glover J. 2000. Humanity: A Moral History of the Twentieth Century New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
34. Goodin RE. 1988. Reasons for Welfare: The Political Theory of the Welfare State Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
35. Goodsell C. 1988. The Social Meaning of Civic Space: Studying Political Authority Through Architecture Lawrence: Univ. Press Kans.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Goodsell C. 2001. The American Statehouse: Interpreting Democracy's Temples Lawrence: Univ. Press Kans.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Griggs S, Norval AJ, Wagenaar H, eds. 2014. Practices of Freedom: Decentred Governance, Conflict and Democratic Participation Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
38. Hamburger P. 2014. Is Administrative Law Unlawful? Chicago: Chicago Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
39. Heath J. 2020. The Machinery of Government: Public Administration and the Liberal State New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
40. Herd P, Moynihan DP. 2018. Administrative Burden: Policymaking by Other Means New York: Russell Sage Found.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Heywood P, Kirby N 2020. Public integrity: from anti-corruption rhetoric to substantive moral ideal. Etica Pubblica Studi Leg. Partecip 1:211–31
    [Google Scholar]
42. Honig D. 2018. Navigation by Judgment: Why and When Top-Down Management of Foreign Aid Doesn't Work New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
43. Hood C, Dixon R. 2015. A Government that Worked Better and Cost Less? Evaluating Three Decades of Reform and Change in UK Central Government Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
44. Hull MS. 2012. Government of Paper: The Materiality of Bureaucracy in Urban Pakistan Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
    [Google Scholar]
45. Hupe P, Hill M. 2007. Street-level bureaucracy and public accountability. Public Adm 85:2279–99
    [Google Scholar]
46. Kessler J, Sabel C. 2021. The uncertain future of administrative law. Daedalus 150:3188–207
    [Google Scholar]
47. Kirby N 2021a. An ‘institution-first’ conception of public integrity. Br. J. Political Sci 51:41620–35
    [Google Scholar]
48. Kirby N 2021b. Good governance: an ideal of executive power Paper presented at the European Consortium for Political Research Joint Workshop on Public Ethics online, May 28
    [Google Scholar]
49. Kirby N, Wolff J 2021.. ‘ Quality of government’: a philosophical assessment. The Oxford Handbook of Quality of Government A Bågenholm, M Bauhr, M Grimes, B Rothstein Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
50. Klein S. 2020. The Work of Politics: Making a Democratic Welfare State Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
51. Krislov S, Rosenbloom DH. 1981. Representative Bureaucracy and the American Political System New York: Praeger
    [Google Scholar]
52. Latour B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
53. Latour B. 2010. The Making of Law: An Ethnography of the Conseil d'Etat Cambridge, UK: Polity
    [Google Scholar]
54. Lessig L. 2013.. “ Institutional corruption” defined. J. Law Med. Ethics 413:553–55
    [Google Scholar]
55. Levinson M. 2015. Moral injury and the ethics of educational injustice. Harv. Educ. Rev 85:2203–28
    [Google Scholar]
56. Lipsky M. 2010 (1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services New York: Russell Sage Found 30th anniv. expand. ed .
    [Google Scholar]
57. Longo M, Zacka B. 2019. Political theory in an ethnographic key. Am. Political Sci. Rev 113:41066–70
    [Google Scholar]
58. Mansbridge J 2018. Recursive representation. Creating Political Presence: The New Politics of Democratic Representation D Castiglione, J Pollak 298–338 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
59. Mansbridge J 2020. Representation failure. Democratic Failure: NOMOS LXIII M Schwartzberg, D Viehoff 101–40 New York: NYU Press
    [Google Scholar]
60. Mashaw JL. 1985. Bureaucratic Justice: Managing Social Security Disability Claims New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
61. Mathur N. 2016. Paper Tiger: Law, Bureaucracy and the Developmental State in Himalayan India Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
62. Maynard-Moody S, Musheno M. 2003. Cops, Teachers, Counselors: Stories from the Front Lines of Public Service Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
    [Google Scholar]
63. Mettler S, Soss J. 2004. The consequences of public policy for democratic citizenship: bridging policy studies and mass politics. Perspect. Politics 2:155–73
    [Google Scholar]
64. Mitchell T. 1991. The limits of the state: beyond statist approaches and their critics. Am. Political Sci. Rev 85:177–96
    [Google Scholar]
65. Orren K, Skowronek S. 2017. The Policy State: An American Predicament Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
66. Parrillo NR. 2019. Federal agency guidance and the power to bind: an empirical study of agencies and industries. Yale J. Regul 36:1165–272
    [Google Scholar]
67. Pettit P. 1997. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
68. Piore M. 2011. Beyond markets: sociology, street-level bureaucracy, and the management of the public sector. Regul. Gov 5:1145–64
    [Google Scholar]
69. Puff H, Zacka B 2022. The architectures of waiting: Helmut Puff and Bernardo Zacka in conversation. Contemp. Political Theory https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-021-00533-6
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
70. Rahman KS. 2016. Democracy Against Domination New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
71. Rawls J. 1971. A Theory of Justice Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
72. Richardson HS. 2002. Democratic Autonomy: Public Reasoning About the Ends of Policy New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
73. Richardson HS. 2005. Response to Pettit, Estlund, and Christiano. Philos. Phenomenol. Res 71:1218–30
    [Google Scholar]
74. Rohr JA. 1989. Ethics for Bureaucrats: An Essay on Law and Values New York: Dekker 2nd revis. expand. ed .
    [Google Scholar]
75. Rosanvallon P. 2011. Democratic Legitimacy: Impartiality, Reflexivity, Proximity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
76. Rosanvallon P. 2018. Good Government: Democracy Beyond Elections Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
77. Rothstein B. 2011. The Quality of Government: Corruption, Social Trust, and Inequality in International Perspective Chicago: Chicago Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
78. Rothstein B, Teorell J. 2008. What is quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions. Governance 21:2165–90
    [Google Scholar]
79. Scharpf FW. 1998. Interdependence and democratic legitimation Work. Pap. 98/2 Max Planck Inst. Study Soc., Cologne Ger: http://www.mpifg.de/pu/workpap/wp98-2/wp98-2.html
    [Google Scholar]
80. Schmidt V. 2013. Democracy and legitimacy in the European Union revisited: input, output, and ‘throughput. ’. Political Stud 61:12–22
    [Google Scholar]
81. Shapiro I. 2002. Problems, methods, and theories in the study of politics, or what's wrong with political science and what to do about it. Political Theory 30:4596–619
    [Google Scholar]
82. Sharma A, Gupta A, eds. 2006. The Anthropology of the State: A Reader Oxford, UK: Blackwell
    [Google Scholar]
83. Shaw CK. 1992. Hegel's theory of modern bureaucracy. Am. Political Sci. Rev 86:2381–89
    [Google Scholar]
84. Soss J, Fording RC, Schram S, eds. 2011. Disciplining the Poor: Neoliberal Paternalism and the Persistent Power of Race Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
85. Sowa JE, Selden SC. 2003. Administrative discretion and active representation: an expansion of the theory of representative bureaucracy. Public Adm. Rev 63:6700–10
    [Google Scholar]
86. Stensöta H. 2010. The conditions of care: reframing the debate about public sector ethics. Public Adm. Rev 70:2295–303
    [Google Scholar]
87. Sunstein CR, Vermeule A. 2020. Law & Leviathan: Redeeming the Administrative State Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
88. Thompson DF. 2005. Restoring Responsibility: Ethics in Government, Business, and Healthcare Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
89. Thompson DF. 2018. Theories of institutional corruption. Annu. Rev. Political Sci 21:495–513
    [Google Scholar]
90. Tushnet M 2021. The administrative state in the twenty-first century: deconstruction and/or reconstruction. Daedalus 150:3)
    [Google Scholar]
91. Tyler T. 2006. Why People Obey the Law Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
92. Van Berkel R, Caswell D, Kupka P, Larsen F. 2017. Frontline Delivery of Welfare-to-Work Policies in Europe: Activating the Unemployed New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
93. Vermeule A. 2016. Law's Abnegation: From Law's Empire to the Administrative State Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
94. Wamsley GL, Bacher RN, Goodsell CT, Kronenberg PS, Rohr JA et al. 1990. Refounding Public Administration Newbury Park, CA: Sage
    [Google Scholar]
95. Warren M. 2009. Governance-driven democratization. Crit. Policy Stud 3:13–13
    [Google Scholar]
96. Weber M 1979. Bureaucracy. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology H Gerth, CW Mills 196–266 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
97. Weller J. 2018. Fabriquer des actes d'état: une ethnographie du travail bureaucratique Paris: Economica
    [Google Scholar]
98. Wilson JQ. 1968. Varieties of Police Behavior: The Management of Law and Order in Eight Communities Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
99. Wilson JQ. 1989. Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It New York: Basic
    [Google Scholar]
100. Wolff J. 1998. Fairness, respect, and the egalitarian ethos. Philos. Public Aff 27:297–122
     [Google Scholar]
101. Yates J. 1989. Control Through Communication: The Rise of System in American Management Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
102. Zacka B. 2017a. When the State Meets the Street: Public Service and Moral Agency Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
103. Zacka B. 2017b. Why bureaucrats don't seem to care. Atlantic Monthly Oct. 12
     [Google Scholar]
104. Zacka B 2019. Street-level bureaucracy and democratic theory. Research Handbook on Street-Level Bureaucracy P Hupe 448–61 Cheltenham, UK: Elgar
     [Google Scholar]