1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Political Science
  4. Volume 20, 2017
  5. Article

Annual Review of Political Science

Volume 20, 2017

From a Deficit of Democracy to a Technocratic Order: The Postcrisis Debate on Europe

Abstract

The political problems of democratic legitimacy related to the construction of the European Union have mutated deeply during the crisis. The survival of the Eurozone has exacted a high toll on democratic principles. National representative democracy has been weakened due to the imperatives of economic integration. The technocratic elements of European integration (independent agencies, binding rules on economic matters) have expanded dramatically in scope. In the past, the technocratic dimension was circumscribed to efficiency-enhancing policies; during the crisis, it has been extended to issues with clear distributional consequences (such as the burden of adjustment between debtor and creditor countries). The resulting paradox is that in a time of growing “politicization” of European affairs, the technocratic bias of the European Union has “depoliticized” economic issues. This article reviews the recent debates about the tension between technocracy and democracy in the context of European supranational integration.

Keyword(s): central bank independence, democratic deficit, European integration, independent agencies, Rodrik's trilemma, technocracy
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-061915-110623
2017-05-11
2024-07-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/20/1/annurev-polisci-061915-110623.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-061915-110623&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Adolph C. 2013. Bankers, Bureaucrats, and Central Bank Politics Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  2. Alonso S. 2014. ‘You can vote but you cannot choose’: democracy and the sovereign debt crisis in the Eurozone Work. Pap. 282, Carlos III–Juan March Inst. Social Sci. https://e-archivo.uc3m.es/bitstream/handle/10016/18315/IC3JM-2014-282.pdf?sequence=3 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bellamy R. 2010. Democracy without democracy? Can the EU's democratic ‘outputs’ be separated from the democratic ‘inputs’ provided by competitive parties and majority rule. ? J. Eur. Public Policy 17:12–19 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bibow J. 2013. At the crossroads: the euro and its central bank guardian (and saviour?). Cambridge J. Econ. 37:609–26 [Google Scholar]
  5. Blyth M. 2013. Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  6. Bourdieu P. 2002. Against the policy of depoliticization. Stud. Polit. Econ. 69:31–41 [Google Scholar]
  7. Braun D, Tausendpfund M. 2014. The impact of the euro crisis on citizens’ support for the European Union. J. Eur. Integr. 36:3231–5 [Google Scholar]
  8. Caplan B. 2007. The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  9. Centeno M. 1993. The new Leviathan: the dynamics and limits of technocracy. Theory Soc 22:3307–35 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cheneval F, Schimmelfennig F. 2013. The case for demoicracy in the European Union. J. Common Market Stud. 51:2334–50 [Google Scholar]
  11. Clements B, Nanou K, Verney S. 2014. ‘We no longer love you, but we don't want to leave you’: the Eurozone crisis and popular Euroscepticism in Greece. J. Eur. Integr. 36:3247–65 [Google Scholar]
  12. Copelovitch M, Frieden J, Walker S. 2016. The political economy of the euro crisis. Comp. Polit. Stud. 49:7811–40 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cremme O, Hobolt SB. 2015. Democratic Politics in a European Union under Stress Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  14. Crum B. 2013. Saving the euro at the cost of democracy?. J. Common Market Stud. 51:4614–30 [Google Scholar]
  15. De Grauwe P. 2011. The governance of a fragile Eurozone CEPS work. doc. 346. Cent. Eur. Policy Stud. https://www.ceps.eu/system/files/book/2011/05/WD%20346%20De%20Grauwe%20on%20Eurozone%20Governance.pdf [Google Scholar]
  16. De Grauwe P. 2013. The political economy of the euro. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 16:153–70 [Google Scholar]
  17. De Vries CE, Edwards EE. 2009. Taking Europe to its extremes: extremist parties and public euroscepticism. Party Polit 15:15–28 [Google Scholar]
  18. Elster J, Slagstad R. 1993. Constitutionalism and Democracy Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  19. Estlund D. 2008. Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  20. Featherstone K. 1994. Jean Monnet and the ‘democratic deficit’ in the European Union. J. Common Market Stud. 32:2149–70 [Google Scholar]
  21. Fernández-Albertos J. 2015. The politics of central bank independence. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 18:217–37 [Google Scholar]
  22. Fishman RM. 2014. Democracy and markets: notes on a twenty-first-century paradox. Reflections on Uneven Democracies: The Legacy of Guillermo O'Donnell D Brinks, M Leiras, S Mainwaring 106–20 Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  23. Fishman RM. 2016. Rethinking dimensions of democracy for empirical analysis: authenticity, quality, depth, and consolidation. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 19:289–309 [Google Scholar]
  24. Fligstein N, Polyakova A, Sandholtz W. 2012. European integration, nationalism and European identity. J. Common Market Stud. 50:1106–22 [Google Scholar]
  25. Follesdal A, Hix S. 2006. Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: a response to Majone and Moravcsik. J. Common Market Stud. 44:3533–62 [Google Scholar]
  26. Grande E, Kriesi H. 2015. The Europeanization of the national political debate. See Cremme & Hobolt 2015 67–86
  27. Habermas J. 2015. The Lure of Technocracy Cambridge, UK: Polity [Google Scholar]
  28. Hall PA. 2014. Varieties of capitalism and the euro crisis. West Eur. Polit. 37:61223–43 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hewitt G. 2013. The Lost Continent: Europe's Darkest Hour Since World War Two London: Hodder & Stoughton [Google Scholar]
  30. Hix S. 2015. Democratizing a macroeconomic union in Europe. See Cremme & Hobolt 2015 180–98
  31. Hix S, Høyland B. 2013. Empowering the European Parliament. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 16:171–89 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hix S, Marsh M. 2011. Second-order effects plus pan-European political swings: an analysis. Elect. Stud. 30:14–15 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hobolt SB. 2015. Public attitudes towards the euro crisis. See Cremme & Hobolt 2015 48–66
  34. Hobolt SB, De Vries C. 2016. Turning against the union? The impact of the crisis on the Eurosceptic vote in the 2014 European Parliament elections. Elect. Stud. 44:504–14 [Google Scholar]
  35. Hobolt SB, Wratil C. 2015. Public opinion and the crisis: the dynamics of support for the euro. J. Eur. Public Policy 22:2238–56 [Google Scholar]
  36. Holmes S. 1997. Passions and Constraints: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  37. Hooghe L, Marks G. 2009. A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: from permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 39:11–23 [Google Scholar]
  38. Howarth D, Loedel P. 2003. The European Central Bank: The New European Leviathan? Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan [Google Scholar]
  39. Iversen T, Soskice D, Hope D. 2016. The Eurozone and political economic institutions. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 19:163–85 [Google Scholar]
  40. Johnston A, Hancké B, Pant S. 2014. Comparative institutional advantage in the European sovereign debt crisis. Comp. Polit. Stud. 47:131771–800 [Google Scholar]
  41. Koopmans R. 2015. How advanced is the Europeanization of public spheres? Comparing German and European structures of political communication. European Public Spheres T Risse 53–83 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  42. Lohmann S. 1998. Federalism and central bank independence: the politics of German monetary policy, 1957–92. World Polit 50:3401–46 [Google Scholar]
  43. Mackie G. 2004. Democracy Defended Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  44. Mackie G. 2009. Schumpeter's leadership democracy. Polit. Theory 37:1128–53 [Google Scholar]
  45. Mair P. 2007. Political opposition and the European Union. Gov. Opposition 41:11–17 [Google Scholar]
  46. Mair P. 2013. Ruling the Void: The Hollowing-Out of Western Democracy London: Verso [Google Scholar]
  47. Majone G. 1996. Regulating Europe London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  48. Majone G. 1998. Europe's ‘democratic deficit’: the question of standards. Eur. Law J. 4:15–28 [Google Scholar]
  49. Majone G. 2014. Rethinking the Union of Europe Post-Crisis: Has Integration Gone Too Far? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  50. Marsh D. 1992. The Most Powerful Bank: Inside Germany's Bundesbank New York: Random House [Google Scholar]
  51. Marsh D. 2011. The Euro: The Battle for the New Global Currency New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  52. McNamara KR. 2015. The forgotten problem of embeddedness: history lessons for the euro. The Future of the Euro M Matthijs, M Blyth 21–43 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  53. Menéndez AJ. 2013. The existential crisis of the European Union. Ger. Law J. 14:05453–526 [Google Scholar]
  54. Moodie JR, Holst C. 2014. For the sake of democracy? The European Commission's justification for democratising expertise. Expertise and Democracy C Holst 293–321 Oslo: ARENA Report 1/14 [Google Scholar]
  55. Moravcsik A. 1998. The Choice for Europe. Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  56. Moravcsik A. 2002. In defence of the ‘democratic deficit’: reassessing the legitimacy of the European Union. J. Common Market Stud. 40:4603–24 [Google Scholar]
  57. Moravcsik A. 2012. Europe after the crisis. Foreign Aff 91:354–68 [Google Scholar]
  58. Newman M. 1996. Democracy, Sovereignty and the European Union London: Hurst [Google Scholar]
  59. Nicolaïdis K. 2013. European demoicracy and its crisis. J. Common Market Stud. 51:2351–69 [Google Scholar]
  60. Offe C. 2015. Europe Entrapped Cambridge, UK: Polity [Google Scholar]
  61. Pettit P. 2004. Depoliticizing democracy. Ratio Juris 17:152–65 [Google Scholar]
  62. Pisani-Ferry J. 2011. The Euro-Crisis and Its Aftermath Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  63. Radaelli CM. 1999. Technocracy in the European Union London: Longman [Google Scholar]
  64. Reiff K, Schmitt H. 1980. Nine second-order national elections. a conceptual framework for the analysis of European election results. Eur. J. Polit. Res. 8:13–44 [Google Scholar]
  65. Riker W. 1982. Liberalism against Populism: A Confrontation Between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice San Francisco: W.H. Freeman [Google Scholar]
  66. Risse T. 2015. European Public Spheres Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  67. Rodríguez-Aguilera del Prat C. 2015. El déficit democrático europeo Madrid: Catarata [Google Scholar]
  68. Rodríguez Zapatero JL. 2013. El dilemma. 600 días de vértigo. Barcelona: Planeta [Google Scholar]
  69. Rodrik D. 2011. The Globalization Paradox: Why Global Markets, States, and Democracy Can't Coexist Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  70. Rodrik D. 2016. Brexit and the globalization trilemma. Dani Rodrik's Weblog Jun. 13. http://rodrik.typepad.com/dani_rodriks_weblog/2016/06/brexit-and-the-globalization-trilemma.html [Google Scholar]
  71. Roth F, Gros D, Nowak-Lehmann DF. 2014. Crisis and citizens’ trust in the European Central Bank—panel data evidence for the euro area, 1999–2012. J. Eur. Integr. 36:3303–20 [Google Scholar]
  72. Sánchez-Cuenca I. 2001. The political basis of support for European integration. Eur. Union Polit. 1:2147–71 [Google Scholar]
  73. Sánchez-Cuenca I. 2014. La impotencia democrática Madrid: Catarata [Google Scholar]
  74. Sandbu M. 2015. European Orphans: The Future of the Euro and the Politics of Debt Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  75. Scharpf F. 1999. Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  76. Scharpf F. 2015. Political legitimacy in a non-optimal currency. See Cremme & Hobolt 2015 19–47
  77. Schimmelfennig F. 2014. European integration in the euro crisis: the limits of postfunctionalism. J. Eur. Integr. 36:3321–37 [Google Scholar]
  78. Schmidt V. 2013. Democracy and legitimacy in the European Union revisited: input, output and ‘throughput’. Polit. Stud. 61:12–22 [Google Scholar]
  79. Schmitter PC. 2000. How to Democratize the European Union…And Why Bother? Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield [Google Scholar]
  80. Serricchio F, Tsakatika M, Quaglia L. 2013. Euroscepticism and the global financial crisis. J. Common Market Stud. 51:151–64 [Google Scholar]
  81. Siedentop L. 2001. Democracy in Europe New York: Columbia Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  82. Sinn H-W. 2014. The Euro-Trap. On Bursting Bubbles, Budgets, and Beliefs. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  83. Somek A. 2015. Delegation and authority: authoritarian liberalism today. Eur. Law J. 21:3340–60 [Google Scholar]
  84. Streeck W. 2014. Buying Time. The Delayed Crisis of Democratic Capitalism London: Verso [Google Scholar]
  85. Streeck W. 2015. Heller, Schmitt, and the euro. Eur. Law J. 21:3361–70 [Google Scholar]
  86. Treib O. 2014. The voter says no, but nobody listens: causes and consequences of the Eurosceptic vote in the 2014 European elections. J. Eur. Public Policy 21:101541–54 [Google Scholar]
  87. Tsebelis G. 2002. Veto Players. How Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  88. Verdun A, Christiansen T. 2000. Policies, institutions, and the euro: dilemmas of legitimacy. After the Euro: Shaping Institutions for Governance in the Wake of European Monetary Union C Crouch 162–78 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  89. Weiler JHH. 1999. The Constitution of Europe: “Do the New Clothes Have an Emperor” and Other Essays on European Integration Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  90. Weiler JHH, Ulrich RH, Mayer FC. 1995. European democracy and its critique. West Eur. Polit. 18:34–39 [Google Scholar]
  91. Wolf M. 2014. The Shifts and the Shocks: What We've Learned—and Have Still to Learn—from the Financial Crisis New York: Penguin [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-061915-110623
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error