1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Political Science
  4. Volume 18, 2015
  5. Article

Annual Review of Political Science

Volume 18, 2015

Law and Politics in Transitional Justice

Abstract

The tension between law and politics places transitional justice under cross-pressures. The impetus to hold perpetrators legally accountable for atrocities and major rights violations has emerged in part from the expectation that subjecting political behavior to the apolitical judgment of law will exert a civilizing effect. As demands for accountability have risen, politics has played a central role at every step. The past decade has seen a flourishing of research in empirical political science on the relationship between law and politics in postconflict and postauthoritarian justice. This research has tried to explain the turn to individual legal accountability and the development of norms and institutions for accountability. Research has stressed the role of politics in shaping the implementation of trials and other modes of accountability. It has also examined the consequences of these modes of accountability. We address research on each of these topics.

Keyword(s): democratization, human rights, international institutions, international justice, international tribunals
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-122013-110512
2015-05-11
2024-07-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/18/1/annurev-polisci-122013-110512.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-122013-110512&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Ainley K. 2011. The International Criminal Court on trial. Cambridge Rev. Intl. Aff. 24:309–33 [Google Scholar]
  2. Akhavan P. 1998. Justice in the Hague, peace in the former Yugoslavia? A commentary on the United Nations war crimes tribunal. Hum. Rights Q. 20:737–816 [Google Scholar]
  3. Akhavan P. 2009. Are international criminal tribunals a disincentive to peace? Reconciling judicial romanticism with political realism. Hum. Rights Q. 31:624–54 [Google Scholar]
  4. Allen T. 2006.. Trial Justice: The International Criminal Court and the Lord's Resistance Army London: Zed Books
  5. Alvarez JE. 1998. Rush to closure: lessons of the Tadić judgment. Mich. Law Rev. 96:2031–112 [Google Scholar]
  6. Backer D. 2009. Cross-national comparative analysis. Assessing the Impact of Transitional Justice: Challenges for Empirical Research HV Der Merwe, V Baxter, AR Chapman 23–89 Washington, DC: US Inst. Peace Press [Google Scholar]
  7. Backer D. 2010. Watching a bargain unravel? A panel study of victims' attitudes about transitional justice in Cape Town, South Africa. Intl. J. Transitional Justice 4:443–56 [Google Scholar]
  8. Baines E. 2007. The haunting of Alice: local approaches to justice and reconciliation in Northern Uganda. Intl. J. Transitional Justice 1:91–114 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bass GJ. 2000. Stay the Hand of Vengeance: The Politics of War Crimes Tribunals Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  10. Binningsbo HM, Loyle CE, Gates S, Elster J. 2012. Armed conflict and post-conflict justice, 1946–2006: a dataset. J. Peace Res. 49:731–40 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bosco D. 2014. Rough Justice: The International Criminal Court in a World of Power Politics New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  12. Branch A. 2007. Uganda's civil war and the politics of ICC intervention. Ethics Intl. Aff. 21:179–98 [Google Scholar]
  13. Broache M. 2014. The International Criminal Court and atrocities in DRC: a case study of the RCD-Goma (Nkunda Faction)/CNDP/M23 Rebel Group Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2434703 [Google Scholar]
  14. Busby JW. 2010. Moral Movements and Foreign Policy Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  15. Chapman AR, Ball P. 2001. The truth of truth commissions: comparative lessons from Haiti, South Africa, and Guatemala. Hum. Rights Q. 23:1–43 [Google Scholar]
  16. Clark P. 2010a. The Gacaca Courts, Post-Genocide Justice and Reconciliation in Rwanda: Justice without Lawyers Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  17. Clark P. 2010b. Chasing cases: the ICC and the politics of state referral in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Uganda. The International Criminal Court and Complementarity: From Theory to Practice C Stahn Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  18. Cronin-Furman K. 2013. Managing expectations: international criminal trials and the prospects for deterrence of mass atrocity. Intl. J. Transitional Justice 7:434–54 [Google Scholar]
  19. Cronin-Furman K. 2015. Bargaining over justice: accountability in the aftermath of mass atrocity PhD thesis, Columbia Univ. [Google Scholar]
  20. De Greiff P. 2012. Theorizing transitional justice. Transitional Justice M Williams, R Nagy, J Elster 31–77 New York and London: New York Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  21. Finnemore M, Sikkink K. 1998. International norm dynamics and political change. Intl. Organ. 52:887–917 [Google Scholar]
  22. Fletcher LE, Weinstein HM, Rowen J. 2009. Context, timing and the dynamics of transitional justice: a historical perspective. Hum. Rights Q. 31:163–220 [Google Scholar]
  23. Fortna VP. 2008. Does Peacekeeping Work? Shaping Belligerents' Choices after Civil War Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  24. Freeman M. 2006. Truth Commissions and Procedural Fairness New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  25. Freeman M. 2009. Necessary Evils: Amnesties and the Search for Justice New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  26. Freeman M, Pensky M. 2012. The amnesty controversy in international law. Amnesty in the Age of Human Rights Accountability F Lessa, L Payne 42–68 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  27. Frulli M. 2000. The special court for Sierra Leone: some preliminary comments. Eur. J. Intl. Law 11:857–69 [Google Scholar]
  28. Gerth HH, Mills CW. 1946. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  29. Gibson JL, Gouws A. 1999. Truth and reconciliation in South Africa: attributions of blame and the struggle over apartheid. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 93:501–17 [Google Scholar]
  30. Gibson JL. 2004. Overcoming Apartheid: Can Truth Reconcile a Divided Nation? New York: Russell Sage Found. [Google Scholar]
  31. Goemans HE. 2000. War and Punishment: The Causes of War Termination and the First World War Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  32. Hafner-Burton E, Ron J. 2013. The Latin bias: regions, the Anglo-American media, and human rights. Intl. Stud. Q. 57:3474–91 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hayner P. 2010. Unspeakable Truths: Transitional Justice and the Challenge of Truth Commissions New York: Taylor and Francis [Google Scholar]
  34. Hopgood S. 2013. The Endtimes of Human Rights Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  35. Howse RL, Teitel R. 2010. Beyond compliance: rethinking why international law really matters. Glob. Policy (online) 1:10–08 [Google Scholar]
  36. Human Rights Watch 2009. Selling Justice Short: Why Accountability Matters for Peace New York: Hum. Rights Watch [Google Scholar]
  37. Huntington S. 1991. The Third Wave. Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman and London: Univ. of Oklahoma Press [Google Scholar]
  38. Ikenberry J. 2011. Liberal Leviathan: the Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  39. Jo H, Simmons BA. 2014. Can the International Criminal Court deter atrocity? Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2552820 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2552820 [Google Scholar]
  40. Kelley J. 2007. Who keeps international commitments and why? The International Criminal Court and bilateral nonsurrender agreements. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 3:573–89 [Google Scholar]
  41. Kerr R. 2004. The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia: An Exercise in Law, Politics, and Diplomacy Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  42. Kim HJ, Sikkink K. 2010. Explaining the deterrence effect of human rights prosecutions for transitional countries. Intl. Stud. Q. 54:934–63 [Google Scholar]
  43. Kim HJ, Sharman JC. 2014. Account and accountability: corruption, human rights, and the individual accountability norm. Intl. Organ. 68:417–48 [Google Scholar]
  44. Krasner SD. 1985. Structural Conflict: The Third World against Global Liberalism Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
  45. Lake M. 2014. Organizing hypocrisy: providing legal accountability for human rights violations in areas of limited statehood. Intl. Stud. Q. 58:515–26 [Google Scholar]
  46. Lamont C. 2010. International Criminal Justice and the Politics of Compliance. Farnham, UK: Ashgate [Google Scholar]
  47. Leebaw B. 2011. Judging State-Sponsored Violence, Imagining Political Change New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  48. Lind J. 2008. Sorry States: Apologies in International Politics Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  49. Linton S. 2001. Cambodia, East Timor and Sierra Leone: experiments in international justice. Crim. Law Forum 12:185–246 [Google Scholar]
  50. Lutz E, Sikkink K. 2001. The justice cascade: the evolution and impact of foreign human rights trials in Latin America. Chicago J. Intl. Law 2:1–34 [Google Scholar]
  51. Mallinder L. 2008. Amnesty, Human Rights and Political Transitions: Bridging the Peace and Justice Divide Oxford, UK: Hart [Google Scholar]
  52. Mallinder L. 2012. Amnesties' challenge to the global accountability norm? Interpreting regional and international trends in amnesty enactment. Amnesty in the Age of Human Rights Accountability: Comparative and International Perspectives F Lessa, LA Payne 69–96 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  53. Mendeloff D. 2004. Truth-seeking, truth-telling and post-conflict peacebuilding: curb the enthusiasm?. Intl. Stud. Rev. 6:355–80 [Google Scholar]
  54. Mendeloff D. 2014. Punish or persuade? The ICC and the limits to coercion in cases of ongoing violence Presented at Annu. Conv. Intl. Stud. Assoc., Toronto [Google Scholar]
  55. Nalepa N. 2010. Skeletons in the Closet: Transitional Justice in Post-Communist Europe New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  56. Neier A. 2012. The International Human Rights Movement: A History Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  57. Nettelfield L. 2010. Courting Democracy in Bosnia and Herzegovina: The Hague Tribunal's Impact in a Postwar State New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  58. New York Times 2015. The Afghan president's overreach. Jan. 3. http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/01/04/opinion/sunday/the-afghan-presidents-overreach.html?smid=tw-share&_r=2&referrer=
  59. Nino C. 1998. Radical Evil on Trial New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  60. Nouwen S. 2013. Complementarity in the Line of Fire: The Catalysing Effect of the International Criminal Court in Uganda and Sudan Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  61. Nouwen S, Werner W. 2010. Doing justice to the political: the International Criminal Court in Uganda and Sudan. Eur. J. Intl. Law 21:941–65 [Google Scholar]
  62. Ocampo LM. 2013. Between bombing or doing nothing. Huffington Post Sep. 4. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/luis-moreno-ocampo/between-bombing-or-doing-_b_3869088.html [Google Scholar]
  63. OHCHR (Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights) 2009. Rule-of-Law Tools for Post-Conflict States—Amnesties New York and Geneva: United Nations [Google Scholar]
  64. Olsen TD, Payne LA, Reiter AG. 2010a. Transitional Justice in Balance: Comparing Processes, Weighing Efficacy Washington, DC: US Inst. Peace Press [Google Scholar]
  65. Olsen TD, Payne LA, Reiter AG, Wiebelhaus-Brahm E. 2010b. When truth commissions improve human rights. Intl. J. Transitional Justice 4:457–76 [Google Scholar]
  66. Orentlicher D. 1991. Settling accounts: the duty to prosecute human rights violations of a prior regime. Yale Law J. 100:2537–615 [Google Scholar]
  67. Orentlicher D. 2008. Shrinking the Space for Denial: The Impact of the ICTY in Serbia New York: Open Society Justice Initiative [Google Scholar]
  68. Peskin V. 2008. International Justice in Rwanda and the Balkans: Virtual Trials and the Struggle for State Cooperation New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  69. Philpott D. 2012. Just and Unjust Peace: An Ethic of Political Reconciliation New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  70. Ralph J. 2007. Defending the Society of States: Why America Opposes the International Criminal Court and Its Vision of World Society Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  71. Risse T, Ropp SC, Sikkink K. 1999. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  72. Risse T, Ropp SC, Sikkink K. 2013. The Persistent Power of Human Rights: From Commitment to Compliance Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  73. Rodman K. 2014. Justice as a dialogue between law and politics: embedding the International Criminal Court within conflict management and peacebuilding. J. Intl. Crim. Justice 12:437–69 [Google Scholar]
  74. Samii C. 2013. Who wants to forgive and forget? Transitional justice preferences in post-war Burundi. J. Peace Res. 50:219–33 [Google Scholar]
  75. Scheffer D. 2012. All the Missing Souls: A Personal History of the War Crimes Tribunals Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  76. Schiff BN. 2008. Building the International Criminal Court Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  77. Shklar J. 1964. Legalism: Law, Morals and Political Trials Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  78. Sieff M, Vinjamuri L. 1999. Reconciling order and justice? New institutional solutions in post-conflict states. J. Intl. Aff.: Spec. Ed. Intl. Inst. Justice 52:757–82 [Google Scholar]
  79. Sikkink K, Walling CB. 2007. The impact of human rights trials in Latin America. J. Peace Res. 44:427–45 [Google Scholar]
  80. Sikkink K. 2008. The role of consequences, comparison and counterfactuals in constructivist ethical thought. Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics R Price 83–111 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  81. Sikkink K. 2011. The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions are Changing World Politics New York: W.W. Norton [Google Scholar]
  82. Simmons BA. 2009. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  83. Simmons BA, Danner A. 2010. Credible commitments and the International Criminal Court. Intl. Organ. 64:225–56 [Google Scholar]
  84. Snyder JL, Vinjamuri L. 2003/2004. Trials and errors: principle and pragmatism in strategies of international justice. Intl. Secur. 28:5–44 [Google Scholar]
  85. Snyder JL, Vinjamuri L. 2012. Principled pragmatism and the logic of consequences. Intl. Theory 4:434–48 [Google Scholar]
  86. Sriram CL. 2005. Globalizing Justice for Mass Atrocities: A Revolution in Accountability London and New York: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  87. Stover E, Weinstein HM. 2004. My Neighbor, My Enemy: Justice and Community in the Aftermath of Mass Atrocity Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  88. Struett MJ. 2008. The Politics of Constructing the International Criminal Court: NGOs, Discourse, and Agency New York: Palgrave Macmillan [Google Scholar]
  89. Subotic J. 2009. Hijacked Justice: Dealing with the Past in the Balkans Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  90. Teitel R. 2000. Transitional Justice New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  91. Teitel R. 2014. Globalizing Transitional Justice New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  92. Thoms ONT, Ron J, Paris R. 2010. State-level effects of transitional justice: What do we know?. Intl. J. Transitional Justice 4:329–54 [Google Scholar]
  93. Thomson S. 2011. The darker side of transitional justice: the power dynamics behind Rwanda's gacaca courts. Africa 81:373–90 [Google Scholar]
  94. Thomson S, Nagy R. 2011. Law, power and justice: what legalism fails to address in the functioning of Rwanda's gacaca courts. Intl. J. Transitional Justice 5:11–30 [Google Scholar]
  95. Tiemessen A. 2014. The International Criminal Court and the politics of prosecutions. Intl. J. Hum. Rights 18:444–61 [Google Scholar]
  96. Transitional Justice Institute 2013. The Belfast Guidelines on Amnesty and Accountability Univ. Ulster. http://www.transitionaljustice.ulster.ac.uk/documents/TheBelfastGuidelin [Google Scholar]
  97. Vinjamuri L. 2010. Deterrence, democracy, and the pursuit of international justice. Ethics Intl. Aff. 24:191–211 [Google Scholar]
  98. Vinjamuri L, Boesenecker A. 2007. Peace Agreements and Accountability: Mapping Trends from 1980 to 2006 Geneva: Cent. Humanitarian Dialogue [Google Scholar]
  99. Waldorf L. 2006. Mass justice for mass atrocity: rethinking local justice as transitional justice. Temple Law Rev. 79:1–88 [Google Scholar]
  100. Wiebelhaus-Brahm E. 2010. Truth Commissions and Transitional Societies: The Impact on Human Rights and Democracy Abingdon, UK: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  101. Wilson R. 2001. The Politics of Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa: Legitimizing the Post-Apartheid State New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  102. Zalaquett J. 1995. Confronting human rights violations by former governments: principles applicable and political constraints. Transitional Justice: How Emerging Democracies Reckon with Former Regimes, Vol. 1: General Considerations N Kritz 3–31 Washington, DC: US Inst. Peace [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-122013-110512
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error