The Use of Case Studies in Law and Social Science Research

Literature Cited

1. Armour J, Lele P 2009. Law, finance, and politics: the case of India. Law Soc. Rev. 43:3491–526
   [Google Scholar]
2. Babbie ER 2012. The Practice of Social Research Belmont, CA: Wadsworth
   [Google Scholar]
3. Barker V 2009. The Politics of Imprisonment: How the Democratic Process Shapes the Way America Punishes Offenders New York: Oxford Univ. Press
   [Google Scholar]
4. Becker HS 1992. Cases, causes, conjunctions, stories, and imagery. See Ragin & Becker 1992 205–16
5. Bell J 2002. Policing Hatred: Law Enforcement, Civil Rights, and Hate Crime New York: N.Y. Univ. Press
   [Google Scholar]
6. Brady H, Collier D 2010. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards New York: Rowman & Littlefield
   [Google Scholar]
7. Brereton D, Casper JD 1981. Does it pay to plead guilty? Differential sentencing and the functioning of criminal courts. Law Soc. Rev. 16:145–70
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bumiller K 1987. Victims in the shadow of the law: a critique of the model of legal protection. Signs 12:3421–39
   [Google Scholar]
9. Burawoy M, Hendley K 1992. Between Perestroika and privatisation: divided strategies and political crisis in a Soviet enterprise. Sov. Stud. 44:3371–402
   [Google Scholar]
10. Calavita K 1986. Worker safety, law and society change: the Italian case. Law Soc. Rev. 20:2189–228
    [Google Scholar]
11. Campbell M 2011. Politics, prison and law enforcement: an examination of “law and order” politics in Texas. Law Soc. Rev. 45:3631–65
    [Google Scholar]
12. Cheesman N 2011. How an authoritarian regime in Burma used special courts to defeat judicial independence. Law Soc. Rev. 45:4801–30
    [Google Scholar]
13. Cichowski R 2007. The European Court and Civil Society: Litigation, Mobilization and Governance Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
14. Coleman C, Nee LD, Rubinowitz LS 2005. Social movements and social change litigation: synergy in the Montgomery bus protest. Law Soc. Inq. 30:4663–736
    [Google Scholar]
15. Collier D, Brady H, Seawright J 2010. Sources of leverage in causal inference: towards an alternative view of methodology. See Brady & Collier 2010 161–200
16. Collier D, Gerring J 2008. Concepts and Method in Social Science: The Tradition of Giovanni Sartori New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
17. Dudas J 2008. The Cultivation of Resentment: Treaty Rights and the New Right Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
18. Earl J 2008. Review: “The Process is the Punishment”: thirty years later. Law Soc. Inq. 33:3735–78
    [Google Scholar]
19. Eisenstein J, Jacob H 1977. Felony Justice: An Organizational Analysis of Criminal Courts New York: Little Brown
    [Google Scholar]
20. Elster J 1989. Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
21. Elster J 2007. Explaining Social Behavior: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
22. Ewick P, Silbey SS 1992. Conformity, contestation, and resistance: an account of legal consciousness. New Engl. Law Rev. 26:3731–50
    [Google Scholar]
23. Ewick P, Silbey SS 1998. The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
24. Feeley M 1979. The Process Is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower District Court New York: Russell Sage Found.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Ferrer A 2012. Haiti, free soil, and antislavery in the revolutionary Atlantic. Am. Hist. Rev. 17:140–66
    [Google Scholar]
26. Flemming RB, Nardulli PF, Eisenstein J 1993. The Craft of Justice: Politics and Work in Criminal Court Communities Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
    [Google Scholar]
27. Galanter M 1974. Why the “haves” come out ahead: speculations on the limits of legal change. Law Soc. Rev. 9:95–160
    [Google Scholar]
28. George AL, Bennett G 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
    [Google Scholar]
29. Gerring J 2007. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
30. Gerring J 2012. Mere description. Br. J. Political Sci. 42:2721–46
    [Google Scholar]
31. Ginsburg T 2003. Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
32. Goertz G 2006. Social Science Concepts: A User's Guide Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
33. Goertz G, Mahoney J 2012. A Tale of Two Cultures: Qualitative and Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
34. Gómez LE 2016. Connecting critical race theory with second generation legal consciousness work in Obasogie's Blinded by Sight. Law Soc. Inq. 41:41069–77
    [Google Scholar]
35. Gould JB, Barclay S 2012. Mind the gap: the place of gap studies in socio-legal scholarship. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 8:323–35
    [Google Scholar]
36. Greenhouse CJ, Yngvesson B, Engle DM 1994. Law and Community in Three American Towns Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
37. Hedström P, Swedberg R 1996. Social mechanisms. Acta Sociol 39:281–308
    [Google Scholar]
38. Hedström P, Ylikoski P 2010. Causal mechanisms in the social sciences. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 36:49–67
    [Google Scholar]
39. Hendley K 1993. The quest for rational labor allocation within Soviet enterprises: internal transfers before and during Perestroika. Beyond Sovietology: Essays in Politics and History S Solomon 125–58 Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe
    [Google Scholar]
40. Hendley K 2017. Everyday Law in Russia Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
41. Heumann M 1978. Plea Bargaining Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
42. Hilbink L 2011. Judges Beyond Politics in Democracy and Dictatorship New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
43. Hirschl R 2009. Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
44. Holzmeyer C 2009. Human rights in the era of neoglobalization: the Alien Tort Claims Act and grassroots mobilization in Doe v. Unocal. Law Soc. Rev. 43:2271–304
    [Google Scholar]
45. Jacob H 1983. Trial courts in the United States: the travails of exploration. Law Soc. Rev. 3:3407–24
    [Google Scholar]
46. Kagan R 2003. Adversarial Legalism: The American Way of Law Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
47. Kapiszewski D 2012. High Courts and Economic Governance in Argentina and Brazil New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
48. Kawar LC 2014. Commanding Legality: The Juridification of Immigration Policymaking in France Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
49. Kelemen RD, Sibbitt EC 2005. Lex Americana? A response to Levi-Faur. Int. Organ. 59:2463–72
    [Google Scholar]
50. King G, Keohane RO, Verba S 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
51. Lemaitre J, Sandvik KB 2015. Shifting frames, vanishing resources, and dangerous political opportunities: legal mobilization among displaced women in Columbia. Law Soc. Rev. 49:15–38
    [Google Scholar]
52. Levi-Faur D 2005. The political economy of legal globalization: juridification, adversarial legalism and responsive regulation. a comment. Int. Organ. 59:2451–62
    [Google Scholar]
53. Lipskey M 1979. Street-Level Bureaucracy: The Individual in Public Services New York: Russell: Sage Found.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Massoud MF 2013. Law's Fragile State: Colonial, Authoritarian and Humanitarian Legacies in Sudan New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
55. Mather L 1979. Plea Bargaining or Trial: The Process of Criminal-Case Disposition Lexington, MA: Lexington Books
    [Google Scholar]
56. McCann M 1992. Reform litigation on trial. Law Soc. Inq. 17:4715–43
    [Google Scholar]
57. McCann M 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
58. Merry SE 1990. Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness Among Working-Class Americans Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
59. Miller LL 2008. The Perils of Federalism: Race, Poverty, and the Politics of Crime Control New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
60. Miller LL, Eisenstein J 2005. The federal/state criminal prosecution nexus: a case study in cooperation and discretion. Law Soc. Inq. 30:2239–68
    [Google Scholar]
61. Milner N 1987. The right to refuse treatment: four case studies of legal mobilization. Law Soc. Rev. 21:3447–86
    [Google Scholar]
62. Moustafa T 2007. The Struggle for Constitutional Power: Law Politics, and Economic Development in Egypt Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
63. Paris M 2001. Legal mobilization and the politics of reform: lessons from school finance litigation in Kentucky, 1984–1995. Law Soc. Inq. 26:3631–84
    [Google Scholar]
64. Ragin CC, Becker HS 1992. What Is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
65. Rosenberg G 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
66. Roussell A 2015. Policing the anticommunity: race, deterritorialization, in labor market reorganization in South Los Angeles. Law Soc. Rev. 49:4813–45
    [Google Scholar]
67. Ryan JP 1980. Adjudication and sentencing in a misdemeanor court: The outcome is the punishment. Law Soc. Rev. 15:80–107
    [Google Scholar]
68. Sarat A 1990. The law is all over: power, resistance and the legal consciousness of the welfare poor. Yale J. Law Humanit. 2:343–79
    [Google Scholar]
69. Sartori G 1970. Concept misinformation in comparative politics. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 64:41033–53
    [Google Scholar]
70. Scheingold SA 1984. The Politics of Law and Order: Street Crime and Public Policy New York: Longman
    [Google Scholar]
71. Scheingold SA 1991. The Politics of Street Crime: Criminal Process and Cultural Obsession Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
72. Scheppele KL 2003. Constitutional negotiations: political contexts of judicial activism in post-Soviet Europe. Int. Sociol. 18:1219–38
    [Google Scholar]
73. Scheppele KL 2004. Constitutional ethnography: an introduction. Law Soc. Rev. 38:3389–406
    [Google Scholar]
74. Schoenfeld H 2010. Mass incarceration and the paradox of prison conditions litigation. Law Soc. Rev. 44:3/4731–67
    [Google Scholar]
75. Seawright J 2016. Multi-Method Social Science: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Tools Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
76. Seron C 1996. The Business of Practicing Lives: The Work Lives of Small-Firm and Solo Attorneys Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
77. Shapiro M 1983. Courts: A Comparative Political Analysis Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
78. Silbey SS 1981. Making sense of the lower courts. Justice Syst. J. 6:113–27
    [Google Scholar]
79. Silbey SS 2005. After legal consciousness. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 1:323–68
    [Google Scholar]
80. Silverstein G 2009. Law's Allure: How Law Shapes, Constrains, Saves, and Kills Politics New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
81. Skolnick JH 1967. Justice Without Trial: Law Enforcement in Democratic Society Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons
    [Google Scholar]
82. Swedlow B 2009. Reason for hope? The spotted owl injunctions and policy change. Law Soc. Inq. 34:4825–67
    [Google Scholar]
83. Tarrow S 2010. Bridging the quantitative-qualitative divide. See Brady & Collier 2010 101–10
84. Tezcür GM 2009. Judicial activism in perilous times: the Turkish case. Law Soc. Rev. 43:2305–36
    [Google Scholar]
85. Tilly C 2001. Mechanisms in political processes. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 4:21–41
    [Google Scholar]
86. Uggen C, Blackstone A 2004. Sexual harassment as gendered expression of power. Am. Sociol. Rev. 69:164–92
    [Google Scholar]
87. Valverde M 2012. Everyday Law on the Streets: City Governance in an Age of Diversity Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
88. Yngvesson B 1993. Virtuous Citizens, Disruptive Subjects: Order and Complaint in a New England Court New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
89. Zackin E 2013. Looking for Rights in All the Wrong Place: Why State Constitution's Contain America's Positive Rights Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]