1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science
  4. Volume 69, 2019
  5. Article

Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science

Volume 69, 2019

Nonempirical Interactions for the Nuclear Shell Model: An Update

Abstract

The nuclear shell model has perhaps been the most important conceptual and computational paradigm for the understanding of the structure of atomic nuclei. While the shell model has been used predominantly in a phenomenological context, there have been efforts stretching back more than half a century to derive shell model parameters based on a realistic interaction between nucleons. More recently, several ab initio many-body methods—in particular, many-body perturbation theory, the no-core shell model, the in-medium similarity renormalization group, and coupled-cluster theory—have developed the capability to provide effective shell model Hamiltonians. We provide an update on the status of these methods and investigate the connections between them and their potential strengths and weaknesses, with a particular focus on the in-medium similarity renormalization group approach. Three-body forces are demonstrated to be important for understanding the modifications needed in phenomenological treatments. We then review some applications of these methods to comparisons with recent experimental measurements, and conclude with some remaining challenges in ab initio shell model theory.

Keyword(s): ab initio, effective interactions, many-body theory, nuclear structure, shell model, similarity renormalization group
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-nucl-101917-021120
2019-10-19
2024-07-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/nucl/69/1/annurev-nucl-101917-021120.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-nucl-101917-021120&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. 1. 
    Goeppert Mayer M. Phys. Rev. 74:235 1948.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. 2. 
    Haxel O, Jensen JHD, Suess HE Phys. Rev. 75:1766 1949.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. 3. 
    Goeppert Mayer M, Jensen JHD Elementary Theory of Nuclear Shell Structure New York: Wiley 1955.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. 4. 
    Dawson JF, Talmi I, Walecka JD Ann. Phys. 18:339 1962.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. 5. 
    Bertsch GF Nucl. Phys. 74:234 1965.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. 6. 
    Kuo TTS, Brown GE Nucl. Phys. 85:40 1966.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. 7. 
    Kuo TTS Nucl. Phys. A 90:199 1967.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. 8. 
    Kuo TTS, Brown GE Nucl. Phys. A 114:241 1968.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. 9. 
    Cohen S, Kurath D Nucl. Phys. 73:1 1965.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. 10. 
    Wildenthal BH Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 11:5 1984.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. 11. 
    Caurier E Phys. Rev. C 59:2033 1999.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. 12. 
    De Shalit A, Talmi I Nuclear Shell Theory New York: Academic 1963.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. 13. 
    Ring P, Schuck P The Nuclear Many-Body Problem Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. 1st ed. 1980.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. 14. 
    Heyde KLG The Nuclear Shell Model Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer 1990.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. 15. 
    Talmi I Contemporary Concepts in Physics 7 Simple Models of Complex Nuclei Chur, Switz.: Harwood 1993.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. 16. 
    Brown BA Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 47:517 2001.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. 17. 
    Talmi I Advances in Nuclear Physics 27 JW Negele, EW Vogt1 Berlin: Springer 2003.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. 18. 
    Caurier E Rev. Mod. Phys. 77:427 2005.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. 19. 
    Johnson CW, Ormand WE, Krastev PG Comput. Phys. Commun. 184:2761 2013.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. 20. 
    Brown B, Rae W Nucl. Data Sheets 120:115 2014.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. 21. 
    Sorlin O, Porquet MG Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 61:602 2008.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. 22. 
    Otsuka T et al. arXiv:1805.06501 [nucl-th] 2018.
  23. 23. 
    Lindgren I, Morrison J Atomic Many-Body Theory New York: Springer 1986.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. 24. 
    Kuo TTS, Osnes E Folded-Diagram Theory of the Effective Interaction in Nuclei, Atoms and Molecules Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer 1990.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. 25. 
    Shavitt I, Bartlett RJ Many-Body Methods in Chemistry and Physics New York: Cambridge Univ. Press 2009.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. 26. 
    Kuo TTS Annu. Rev. Nucl. Sci. 24:101 1974.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. 27. 
    Ellis PJ, Osnes E Rev. Mod. Phys. 49:777 1977.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. 28. 
    Hjorth-Jensen M, Kuo TTS, Osnes E Phys. Rep. 261:125 1995.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. 29. 
    Dean DJ Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 53:419 2004.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. 30. 
    Coraggio L Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 62:135 2009.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. 31. 
    Talmi I Helv. Phys. Acta 25:185 1952.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. 32. 
    Lawson RD, Uretsky JL Phys. Rev. 106:1369 1957.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. 33. 
    Talmi L, Unna I Annu. Rev. Nucl. Sci. 10:353 1960.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. 34. 
    Talmi I, Unna I Nucl. Phys. 30:280 1962.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. 35. 
    Hamada T, Johnston ID Nucl. Phys. 34:382 1962.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. 36. 
    Reid RV Ann. Phys. 50:411 1968.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. 37. 
    Brueckner KA, Levinson CA, Mahmoud HM Phys. Rev. 95:217 1954.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. 38. 
    Brueckner KA, Levinson CA Phys. Rev. 97:1344 1955.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. 39. 
    Day BD Rev. Mod. Phys. 39:719 1967.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. 40. 
    Barrett BR, Kirson MW Nucl. Phys. A 148:145 1970.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. 41. 
    Goode P, Kirson MW Phys. Lett. B 51:221 1974.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. 42. 
    Kirson MW Ann. Phys. 66:624 1971.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. 43. 
    Barrett BR Phys. Lett. B 38:371 1972.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. 44. 
    Kirson MW Ann. Phys. 82:345 1974.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. 45. 
    Vary JP, Sauer PU, Wong CW Phys. Rev. C 7:1776 1973.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. 46. 
    Schucan TH, Weidenmüller HA Ann. Phys. 73:108 1972.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. 47. 
    Schucan TH, Weidenmüller HA Ann. Phys. 76:483 1973.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. 48. 
    Barrett BR Lecture Notes in Physics 40 Effective Interactions and Operators in Nuclei Berlin: Springer 1975.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. 49. 
    Kuo TTS, Lee SY, Ratcliff KF Nucl. Phys. A 176:65 1971.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. 50. 
    Krenciglowa E, Kuo T Nucl. Phys. A 240:195 1975.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. 51. 
    Whitehead RR, Watt A, Cole BJ, Morrison I Advances in Nuclear Physics, Vol. 9 M Baranger123 Boston: Springer 1977.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. 52. 
    Chung W Empirical renormalization of shell-model Hamiltonians and magnetic dipole moments of sd-shell nuclei PhD thesis, Mich. State Univ., Ann Arbor 1976.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. 53. 
    Poves A, Zuker A Phys. Rep. 70:235 1981.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. 54. 
    Brown BA, Wildenthal BH Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 38:29 1988.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. 55. 
    Caurier E, Zuker AP, Poves A, Martínez-Pinedo G Phys. Rev. C 50:225 1994.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. 56. 
    Brown BA, Richter WA, Julies RE, Wildenthal BH Ann. Phys. 182:191 1988.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. 57. 
    Brown BA, Richter WA Phys. Rev. C 74:034315 2006.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. 58. 
    Pieper SC, Wiringa RB Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 51:53 2001.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. 59. 
    Carlson J Rev. Mod. Phys. 87:1067 2015.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. 60. 
    Lynn JE, Tews I, Gandolfi S, Lovato A arXiv:1901.04868 [nucl-th] 2019.
  61. 61. 
    Navrátil P, Barrett BR Phys. Rev. C 54:2986 1996.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. 62. 
    Navrátil P, Kamuntavicius GP, Barrett BR Phys. Rev. C 61:044001 2000.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. 63. 
    Barrett BR, Navrátil P, Vary JP Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 69:131 2013.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. 64. 
    Kümmel H, Lührmann KH, Zabolitzky JG Phys. Rep. 36:1 1978.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. 65. 
    Zabolitzky JG, Ey W Nucl. Phys. A 328:507 1979.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. 66. 
    Emrich K, Zabolitzky JG Nucl. Phys. A 351:439 1981.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. 67. 
    Zheng DC Phys. Rev. C 48:1083 1993.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. 68. 
    Pudliner BS, Pandharipande VR, Carlson J, Wiringa RB Phys. Rev. Lett. 74:4396 1995.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. 69. 
    Coester F, Cohen S, Day B, Vincent CM Phys. Rev. C 1:769 1970.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. 70. 
    Bethe HA Annu. Rev. Nucl. Sci. 21:93 1971.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. 71. 
    Weinberg S Phys. Lett. B 251:288 1990.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. 72. 
    Weinberg S Nucl. Phys. B 363:3 1991.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. 73. 
    Epelbaum E, Hammer HW, Meißner UG Rev. Mod. Phys. 81:1773 2009.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. 74. 
    Machleidt R, Entem D Phys. Rep. 503:1 2011.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. 75. 
    Machleidt R, Sammarruca F Phys. Scr. 91:083007 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. 76. 
    Pastore S Phys. Rev. C 80:034004 2009.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. 77. 
    Pastore S, Girlanda L, Schiavilla R, Viviani M Phys. Rev. C 84:024001 2011.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. 78. 
    Piarulli M Phys. Rev. C 87:014006 2013.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. 79. 
    Kölling S, Epelbaum E, Krebs H, Meißner UG Phys. Rev. C 80:045502 2009.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. 80. 
    Kölling S, Epelbaum E, Krebs H, Meißner UG Phys. Rev. C 84:054008 2011.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. 81. 
    Entem DR, Machleidt R Phys. Lett. B 524:93 2002.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. 82. 
    Entem DR, Kaiser N, Machleidt R, Nosyk Y Phys. Rev. C 91:014002 2015.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. 83. 
    Entem DR, Kaiser N, Machleidt R, Nosyk Y Phys. Rev. C 92:064001 2015.
     [Google Scholar]
  84. 84. 
    Epelbaum E, Krebs H, Meißner UG Phys. Rev. Lett. 115:122301 2015.
     [Google Scholar]
  85. 85. 
    Reinert P, Krebs H, Epelbaum E Eur. Phys. J. A 54:86 2018.
     [Google Scholar]
  86. 86. 
    Ekström A Phys. Rev. C 91:051301 2015.
     [Google Scholar]
  87. 87. 
    Gezerlis A Phys. Rev. C 90:054323 2014.
     [Google Scholar]
  88. 88. 
    Lynn JE Phys. Rev. Lett. 116:062501 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  89. 89. 
    Piarulli M Phys. Rev. C 91:024003 2015.
     [Google Scholar]
  90. 90. 
    Piarulli M Phys. Rev. Lett. 120:052503 2018.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. 91. 
    Navrátil P Few-Body Syst. 41:117 2007.
     [Google Scholar]
  92. 92. 
    Gazit D, Quaglioni S, Navrátil P Phys. Rev. Lett. 103:102502 2009.
     [Google Scholar]
  93. 93. 
    Wilson KG Phys. Rep. 12:75 1974.
     [Google Scholar]
  94. 94. 
    Wilson KG Rev. Mod. Phys. 47:773 1975.
     [Google Scholar]
  95. 95. 
    Polchinski J Nucl. Phys. B 231:269 1984.
     [Google Scholar]
  96. 96. 
    Birse MC, Mcgovern JA, Richardson KG Phys. Lett. B 464:169 1999.
     [Google Scholar]
  97. 97. 
    Bogner SK, Schwenk A, Kuo TTS, Brown GE arXiv:nucl-th/0111042 2001.
  98. 98. 
    Barford T, Birse MC Phys. Rev. C 67:064006 2002.
     [Google Scholar]
  99. 99. 
    Bogner SK, Kuo TTS, Schwenk A Phys. Rep. 386:1 2003.
     [Google Scholar]
  100. 100. 
    Bogner SK, Furnstahl RJ, Perry RJ Phys. Rev. C 75:061001 2007.
     [Google Scholar]
  101. 101. 
    Bogner S, Furnstahl R, Perry R, Schwenk A Phys. Lett. B 649:488 2007.
     [Google Scholar]
  102. 102. 
    Bogner S, Furnstahl R, Schwenk A Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 65:94 2010.
     [Google Scholar]
  103. 103. 
    Furnstahl RJ, Hebeler K Rep. Prog. Phys. 76:126301 2013.
     [Google Scholar]
  104. 104. 
    Polyzou W, Glöckle W Few-Body Syst. 9:97 1990.
     [Google Scholar]
  105. 105. 
    Bethe HA Phys. Rev. 103:1353 1956.
     [Google Scholar]
  106. 106. 
    Goldstone J Proc. R. Soc. A 239:267 1957.
     [Google Scholar]
  107. 107. 
    Bethe HA, Brandow BH, Petschek AG Phys. Rev. 129:225 1963.
     [Google Scholar]
  108. 108. 
    Phillips AC, Barton G Phys. Lett. B 28:378 1969.
     [Google Scholar]
  109. 109. 
    Tjon JA Phys. Lett. 56:217 1975.
     [Google Scholar]
  110. 110. 
    Rustgi ML Phys. Rev. C 4:854 1971.
     [Google Scholar]
  111. 111. 
    Abzouzi A, Caurier E, Zuker AP Phys. Rev. Lett. 66:1134 1991.
     [Google Scholar]
  112. 112. 
    Glazek SD, Wilson KG Phys. Rev. D 48:5863 1993.
     [Google Scholar]
  113. 113. 
    Wegner F Ann. Phys. 3:77 1994.
     [Google Scholar]
  114. 114. 
    Bogner SK, Furnstahl RJ, Ramanan S, Schwenk A Nucl. Phys. A 773:203 2006.
     [Google Scholar]
  115. 115. 
    Hoppe J Phys. Rev. C 96:054002 2017.
     [Google Scholar]
  116. 116. 
    Tichai A, Langhammer J, Binder S, Roth R Phys. Lett. B 756:283 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  117. 117. 
    Jurgenson E, Navrátil P, Furnstahl RJ Phys. Rev. Lett. 103:082501 2009.
     [Google Scholar]
  118. 118. 
    Hebeler K Phys. Rev. C 85:021002 2012.
     [Google Scholar]
  119. 119. 
    Wendt KA Phys. Rev. C 87:061001 2013.
     [Google Scholar]
  120. 120. 
    Roth R, Calci A, Langhammer J, Binder S Phys. Rev. C 90:024325 2014.
     [Google Scholar]
  121. 121. 
    Anderson ER, Bogner SK, Furnstahl RJ, Perry RJ Phys. Rev. C 82:054001 2010.
     [Google Scholar]
  122. 122. 
    Schuster MD Phys. Rev. C 90:011301 2014.
     [Google Scholar]
  123. 123. 
    Parzuchowski NM Phys. Rev. C 96:034324 2017.
     [Google Scholar]
  124. 124. 
    Jurgenson ED Phys. Rev. C 87:054312 2013.
     [Google Scholar]
  125. 125. 
    Hergert H Phys. Rev. Lett. 110:242501 2013.
     [Google Scholar]
  126. 126. 
    Binder S, Langhammer J, Calci A, Roth R Phys. Lett. B 736:119 2014.
     [Google Scholar]
  127. 127. 
    Hagen G, Papenbrock T, Hjorth-Jensen M, Dean DJ Rep. Prog. Phys. 77:096302 2014.
     [Google Scholar]
  128. 128. 
    Hagen G, Jansen GR, Papenbrock T Phys. Rev. Lett. 117:172501 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  129. 129. 
    Morris TD Phys. Rev. Lett. 120:152503 2018.
     [Google Scholar]
  130. 130. 
    Coraggio L Phys. Rev. C 68:034320 2003.
     [Google Scholar]
  131. 131. 
    Holt JD Phys. Rev. C 72:041304 2005.
     [Google Scholar]
  132. 132. 
    Otsuka T Phys. Rev. Lett. 105:032501 2010.
     [Google Scholar]
  133. 133. 
    Holt JD, Otsuka T, Schwenk A, Suzuki T J. Phys. G 39:085111 2012.
     [Google Scholar]
  134. 134. 
    Holt JD, Menéndez J, Schwenk A J. Phys. G 40:075105 2013.
     [Google Scholar]
  135. 135. 
    Holt J, Menéndez J, Schwenk A Eur. Phys. J. A 49:1 2013.
     [Google Scholar]
  136. 136. 
    Holt JD, Menéndez J, Schwenk A Phys. Rev. Lett. 110:022502 2013.
     [Google Scholar]
  137. 137. 
    Holt JD, Menéndez J, Simonis J, Schwenk A Phys. Rev. C 90:024312 2014.
     [Google Scholar]
  138. 138. 
    Tsunoda N, Takayanagi K, Hjorth-Jensen M, Otsuka T Phys. Rev. C 89:024313 2014.
     [Google Scholar]
  139. 139. 
    Bogner SK Phys. Rev. Lett. 113:142501 2014.
     [Google Scholar]
  140. 140. 
    Jansen GR Phys. Rev. Lett. 113:142502 2014.
     [Google Scholar]
  141. 141. 
    Simonis J Phys. Rev. C 93:011302 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  142. 142. 
    Stroberg SR et al.Phys. Rev. C 93:051301(R) 2016.
  143. 143. 
    Stroberg SR Phys. Rev. Lett. 118:032502 2017.
     [Google Scholar]
  144. 144. 
    Tsunoda N Phys. Rev. C 95:021304 2017.
     [Google Scholar]
  145. 145. 
    Hergert H Phys. Rep. 621:165 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  146. 146. 
    Hergert H Phys. Scr. 92:023002 2017.
     [Google Scholar]
  147. 147. 
    Tichai A, Müller J, Vobig K, Roth R arXiv:1809.07571 [nucl-th] 2018.
  148. 148. 
    Forssén C Phys. Rev. C 97:1 2018.
     [Google Scholar]
  149. 149. 
    Lanczos C J. Res. Natl. Bur. Std. 45:255 1950.
     [Google Scholar]
  150. 150. 
    Arnoldi WE Q. Appl. Math. 9:17 1951.
     [Google Scholar]
  151. 151. 
    Davidson ER Comput. Phys. Commun. 53:49 1989.
     [Google Scholar]
  152. 152. 
    Friman B, Schwenk A arXiv:1101.4858 [hep-ph] 2011.
  153. 153. 
    Bogner SK, Furnstahl RJ, Perry RJ Ann. Phys. 323:1478 2008.
     [Google Scholar]
  154. 154. 
    Bloch C, Horowitz J Nucl. Phys. 8:91 1958.
     [Google Scholar]
  155. 155. 
    Feshbach H Ann. Phys. 5:357 1958.
     [Google Scholar]
  156. 156. 
    Brandow BH Rev. Mod. Phys. 39:771 1967.
     [Google Scholar]
  157. 157. 
    Suzuki K, Lee S Prog. Theor. Phys. 64:2091 1980.
     [Google Scholar]
  158. 158. 
    Shurpin J, Müther H, Kuo TTS, Faessler A Nucl. Phys. A 293:61 1977.
     [Google Scholar]
  159. 159. 
    Shurpin J Phys. Lett. B 69:395 1977.
     [Google Scholar]
  160. 160. 
    Takayanagi K Nucl. Phys. A 864:91 2011.
     [Google Scholar]
  161. 161. 
    Takayanagi K Nucl. Phys. A 852:61 2011.
     [Google Scholar]
  162. 162. 
    Navrátil P, Thoresen M, Barrett BR Phys. Rev. C 55:R573 1997.
     [Google Scholar]
  163. 163. 
    Lisetskiy AF Phys. Rev. C 78:044302 2008.
     [Google Scholar]
  164. 164. 
    Lisetskiy AF Phys. Rev. C 80:024315 2009.
     [Google Scholar]
  165. 165. 
    Dikmen E Phys. Rev. C 91:064301 2015.
     [Google Scholar]
  166. 166. 
    Jansen GR et al.Phys. Rev. C 94:011301(R) 2016.
  167. 167. 
    Tsukiyama K, Bogner SK, Schwenk A Phys. Rev. Lett. 106:222502 2011.
     [Google Scholar]
  168. 168. 
    Tsukiyama K, Bogner SK, Schwenk A Phys. Rev. C 85:061304 2012.
     [Google Scholar]
  169. 169. 
    White SR J. Chem. Phys. 117:7472 2002.
     [Google Scholar]
  170. 170. 
    Klein DJ J. Chem. Phys. 61:786 1974.
     [Google Scholar]
  171. 171. 
    Suzuki K Prog. Theor. Phys. 58:1064 1977.
     [Google Scholar]
  172. 172. 
    Wick GC Phys. Rev. 80:268 1950.
     [Google Scholar]
  173. 173. 
    Kutzelnigg W, Mukherjee D J. Chem. Phys. 107:432 1997.
     [Google Scholar]
  174. 174. 
    Morris TD, Parzuchowski NM, Bogner SK Phys. Rev. C 92:034331 2015.
     [Google Scholar]
  175. 175. 
    Morris TD A novel approach to solving the in-medium SRG PhD thesis, Mich. State Univ., Ann Arbor 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  176. 176. 
    Yanai T, Chan GKL J. Chem. Phys. 127:104107 2007.
     [Google Scholar]
  177. 177. 
    Taube AG, Bartlett RJ Int. J. Quantum Chem. 106:3393 2006.
     [Google Scholar]
  178. 178. 
    Shavitt I, Redmon LT J. Chem. Phys. 73:5711 1980.
     [Google Scholar]
  179. 179. 
    Sun ZH Phys. Rev. C 98:054320 2018.
     [Google Scholar]
  180. 180. 
    Kutzelnigg W J. Chem. Phys. 77:3081 1982.
     [Google Scholar]
  181. 181. 
    Kutzelnigg W, Koch S J. Chem. Phys. 79:4315 1983.
     [Google Scholar]
  182. 182. 
    Suzuki K, Okamoto R Prog. Theor. Phys. 70:439 1983.
     [Google Scholar]
  183. 183. 
    Suzuki K, Okamoto R Prog. Theor. Phys. 71:1221 1984.
     [Google Scholar]
  184. 184. 
    Lindgren I J. Phys. B 7:2441 1974.
     [Google Scholar]
  185. 185. 
    Suzuki K Prog. Theor. Phys. 68:1627 1982.
     [Google Scholar]
  186. 186. 
    Miyagi T, Abe T, Okamoto R, Otsuka T Phys. Rev. C 96:1 2017.
     [Google Scholar]
  187. 187. 
    Primas H Rev. Mod. Phys. 35:710 1963.
     [Google Scholar]
  188. 188. 
    Watson TJ, Chan GKL J. Chem. Theory Comput. 12:512 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  189. 189. 
    Brandow BH See Ref. 48 , p. 1 1975.
  190. 190. 
    Hergert H Phys. Rev. C 87:034307 2013.
     [Google Scholar]
  191. 191. 
    Somà V Phys. Rev. C 89:061301 2014.
     [Google Scholar]
  192. 192. 
    Jansen GR Phys. Rev. C 88:024305 2013.
     [Google Scholar]
  193. 193. 
    Primakoff H, Holstein T Phys. Rev. 55:1218 1939.
     [Google Scholar]
  194. 194. 
    Wentzel G Helv. Phys. Acta 15:111 1942.
     [Google Scholar]
  195. 195. 
    Drell SD, Huang K Phys. Rev. 91:1527 1953.
     [Google Scholar]
  196. 196. 
    Skyrme THR Nucl. Phys. 9:615 1959.
     [Google Scholar]
  197. 197. 
    Vautherin D, Brink DM Phys. Rev. C 5:626 1972.
     [Google Scholar]
  198. 198. 
    Dechargé J, Gogny D Phys. Rev. C 21:1568 1980.
     [Google Scholar]
  199. 199. 
    Polls A Nucl. Phys. A 401:124 1983.
     [Google Scholar]
  200. 200. 
    Rath PK Nucl. Phys. A 427:511 1984.
     [Google Scholar]
  201. 201. 
    Osnes E Phys. Lett. B 26:274 1968.
     [Google Scholar]
  202. 202. 
    Goldhammer P, Hill JR, Nachamkin J Nucl. Phys. A 106:62 1968.
     [Google Scholar]
  203. 203. 
    Singh B Nucl. Phys. A 219:621 1973.
     [Google Scholar]
  204. 204. 
    Caesar C Phys. Rev. C 88:034313 2013.
     [Google Scholar]
  205. 205. 
    Zuker A Phys. Rev. Lett. 90:042502 2003.
     [Google Scholar]
  206. 206. 
    Bogner SK Phys. Lett. B 576:265 2003.
     [Google Scholar]
  207. 207. 
    Pieper SC, Varga K, Wiringa RB Phys. Rev. C 66:044310 2002.
     [Google Scholar]
  208. 208. 
    Navrátil P Phys. Rev. Lett. 99:042501 2007.
     [Google Scholar]
  209. 209. 
    Cipollone A, Barbieri C, Navrátil P Phys. Rev. Lett. 111:062501 2013.
     [Google Scholar]
  210. 210. 
    Hagen G Phys. Rev. Lett. 108:242501 2012.
     [Google Scholar]
  211. 211. 
    Nomura M Phys. Lett. B 85:187 1979.
     [Google Scholar]
  212. 212. 
    Hergert H Phys. Rev. C 90:041302 2014.
     [Google Scholar]
  213. 213. 
    Cipollone A, Barbieri C, Navrátil P Phys. Rev. C 92:014306 2015.
     [Google Scholar]
  214. 214. 
    Perez-Martin S, Robledo LM Phys. Rev. C 76:064314 2007.
     [Google Scholar]
  215. 215. 
    Perez-Martin S, Robledo LM Phys. Rev. C 78:014304 2008.
     [Google Scholar]
  216. 216. 
    Matsubara T Prog. Theor. Phys. 14:351 1955.
     [Google Scholar]
  217. 217. 
    Gaudin M Nucl. Phys. 15:89 1960.
     [Google Scholar]
  218. 218. 
    Fetter AL, Walecka JD Theoretical Mechanics of Particles and Continua Mineola, NY: Dover 2003.
     [Google Scholar]
  219. 219. 
    Cole BJ, Watt A, Whitehead RR J. Phys. G 1:213 1975.
     [Google Scholar]
  220. 220. 
    Hebeler K Phys. Rev. C 83:031301 2011.
     [Google Scholar]
  221. 221. 
    Brown BA, Signoracci A, Hjorth-Jensen M Phys. Lett. B 695:507 2011.
     [Google Scholar]
  222. 222. 
    Dirim H, Elliott JP, Evans JA Nucl. Phys. A 244:301 1975.
     [Google Scholar]
  223. 223. 
    Roth R Phys. Rev. Lett. 107:072501 2011.
     [Google Scholar]
  224. 224. 
    Fukui T Phys. Rev. C 98:044305 2018.
     [Google Scholar]
  225. 225. 
    Leach KG Phys. Rev. C 94:011304 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  226. 226. 
    Brodeur M Phys. Rev. C 96:034316 2017.
     [Google Scholar]
  227. 227. 
    Crawford HL Phys. Rev. C 95:064317 2017.
     [Google Scholar]
  228. 228. 
    Garnsworthy AB Phys. Rev. C 96:044329 2017.
     [Google Scholar]
  229. 229. 
    Reiter MP Phys. Rev. C 96:052501 2017.
     [Google Scholar]
  230. 230. 
    Steppenbeck D Phys. Rev. C 96:064310 2017.
     [Google Scholar]
  231. 231. 
    Henderson J Phys. Lett. B 782:468 2018.
     [Google Scholar]
  232. 232. 
    Izzo C Phys. Rev. C 97:014309 2018.
     [Google Scholar]
  233. 233. 
    Leistenschneider E Phys. Rev. Lett. 120:062503 2018.
     [Google Scholar]
  234. 234. 
    Liu HN et al. arXiv:1811.08451 [nucl-ex] 2018.
  235. 235. 
    Michimasa S Phys. Rev. Lett. 121:022506 2018.
     [Google Scholar]
  236. 236. 
    Mougeot M Phys. Rev. Lett. 120:232501 2018.
     [Google Scholar]
  237. 237. 
    Reiter MP Phys. Rev. C 98:024310 2018.
     [Google Scholar]
  238. 238. 
    Randhawa JS Phys. Rev. C 99:021301 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  239. 239. 
    Wienholtz F Nature 498:346 2013.
     [Google Scholar]
  240. 240. 
    Lapoux V Phys. Rev. Lett. 117:1 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  241. 241. 
    Otsuka T Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 47:319 2001.
     [Google Scholar]
  242. 242. 
    Stumpf C, Braun J, Roth R Phys. Rev. C 93:021301 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  243. 243. 
    Pritychenko B, Birch M, Singh B, Horoi M At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 107:1 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  244. 244. 
    Warburton E, Becker J, Brown BA Phys. Rev. C 41 ( 1990.
     [Google Scholar]
  245. 245. 
    Caurier E, Nowacki F, Poves A Phys. Rev. C 90:014302 2014.
     [Google Scholar]
  246. 246. 
    Caurier E, Langanke K, Martínez-Pinedo G Phys. Lett. B 522:240 2001.
     [Google Scholar]
  247. 247. 
    Garcia Ruiz RF Nat. Phys. 12:594 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  248. 248. 
    Horie H, Arima A Phys. Rev. 623:778 1955.
     [Google Scholar]
  249. 249. 
    Siegel S, Zamick L Phys. Lett. B 28:450 1969.
     [Google Scholar]
  250. 250. 
    Siegel S, Zamick L Phys. Lett. B 28:453 1969.
     [Google Scholar]
  251. 251. 
    Siegel S, Zamick L Nucl. Phys. A 145:89 1970.
     [Google Scholar]
  252. 252. 
    Angeli I, Marinova K At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 99:69 2013.
     [Google Scholar]
  253. 253. 
    Stone NJ At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 111/112:1 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  254. 254. 
    Wildenthal BH, Chung W Phys. Rev. C 22:2260 1980.
     [Google Scholar]
  255. 255. 
    Watt A, Singhal RP, Storm MH, Whitehead RR J. Phys. G 7:L145 1981.
     [Google Scholar]
  256. 256. 
    Ellis PJ Nucl. Phys. A 573:216 1994.
     [Google Scholar]
  257. 257. 
    Haxton WC, Song CL Phys. Rev. Lett. 84:5484 2000.
     [Google Scholar]
  258. 258. 
    Haxton WW, Luu T Nucl. Phys. A 690:1 2001.
     [Google Scholar]
  259. 259. 
    McElvain KS, Haxton WC arXiv:1607.06863 [nucl-th] 2016.
  260. 260. 
    McElvain KS, Haxton WC arXiv:1902.03543 [nucl-th] 2019.
  261. 261. 
    Stetcu I, Barrett BR, van Kolck U Phys. Lett. B 653:358 2007.
     [Google Scholar]
  262. 262. 
    Stetcu I, Rotureau J, Barrett BR, van Kolck U J. Phys. G 37:064033 2010.
     [Google Scholar]
  263. 263. 
    Yang CJ Phys. Rev. C 94:064004 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  264. 264. 
    Binder S Phys. Rev. C 93:044332 2015.
     [Google Scholar]
  265. 265. 
    Bansal A Phys. Rev. C 98:054301 2018.
     [Google Scholar]
  266. 266. 
    Huth L, Durant V, Simonis J, Schwenk A Phys. Rev. C 98:044301 2018.
     [Google Scholar]
  267. 267. 
    Migdal AB Theory of Finite Fermi Systems and Applications to Atomic Nuclei New York: Interscience 1967.
     [Google Scholar]
  268. 268. 
    Shankar R Rev. Mod. Phys. 66:129 1994.
     [Google Scholar]
  269. 269. 
    Polchinski J Proceedings of the Theoretical Advanced Study Institute (TASI 92): From Black Holes and Strings to Particles JA Harvey, J Polchinski235 Singapore: World Sci. 1992.
     [Google Scholar]
  270. 270. 
    Chen T, Fröhlich J, Seifert M Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute, Les Houches Summer School, session 62: Fluctuating Geometries in Statistical Mechanics and Field Theory F David, P Ginsparg, J Zinn-Justin pap. C94-08-02.1 Amsterdam: Elsevier 1995.
     [Google Scholar]
  271. 271. 
    Yoshida S, Shimizu N, Togashi T, Otsuka T Phys. Rev. C 98:061301 2018.
     [Google Scholar]
  272. 272. 
    Engel J, Menéndez J Rep. Prog. Phys. 80:046301 2017.
     [Google Scholar]
  273. 273. 
    Menéndez J, Gazit D, Schwenk A Phys. Rev. D 86:103511 2012.
     [Google Scholar]
  274. 274. 
    Volya A, Zelevinsky V Phys. Rev. C 74:064314 2006.
     [Google Scholar]
  275. 275. 
    Papadimitriou G, Vary JP Phys. Lett. B 746:121 2015.
     [Google Scholar]
  276. 276. 
    Baroni S, Navrátil P, Quaglioni S Phys. Rev. C 87:034326 2013.
     [Google Scholar]
  277. 277. 
    Michel N, Nazarewicz W, Płoszajczak M, Vertse T J. Phys. G 36:013101 2009.
     [Google Scholar]
  278. 278. 
    Myo T, Kikuchi Y, Masui H, Katō K Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 79:1 2014.
     [Google Scholar]
  279. 279. 
    Berggren T Nucl. Phys. A 109:265 1968.
     [Google Scholar]
  280. 280. 
    Betan RI, Nazarewicz W Phys. Rev. C 86:034338 2012.
     [Google Scholar]
  281. 281. 
    Jaganathen Y, Michel N, Płoszajczak M Phys. Rev. C 89:034624 2014.
     [Google Scholar]
  282. 282. 
    Fossez K Phys. Rev. C 91:034609 2015.
     [Google Scholar]
  283. 283. 
    Fossez K Phys. Rev. C 94:054302 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  284. 284. 
    Fossez K Phys. Rev. C 93:011305 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  285. 285. 
    Fossez K, Rotureau J, Michel N, Nazarewicz W Phys. Rev. C 96:024308 2017.
     [Google Scholar]
  286. 286. 
    Fossez K, Rotureau J, Michel N, Płoszajczak M Phys. Rev. Lett. 119:032501 2017.
     [Google Scholar]
  287. 287. 
    Jones MD Phys. Rev. C 96:054322 2017.
     [Google Scholar]
  288. 288. 
    Fossez K, Rotureau J, Nazarewicz W Phys. Rev. C 98:061302 2018.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-nucl-101917-021120
Loading
Nonempirical Interactions for the Nuclear Shell Model: An Update
Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 69, 307 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-101917-021120
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-nucl-101917-021120
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-nucl-101917-021120
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error