1932

Abstract

Stablecoins have the potential to drastically increase competition and innovation in financial services by reducing our reliance on traditional intermediaries. But they also introduce new challenges, as regulators rely on intermediaries to ensure financial stability, market integrity, and consumer protection. Because they operate at the interface between traditional banking and cryptocurrencies, stablecoins also represent an ideal setting for understanding the key trade-offs cryptocurrencies involve, and insights from robust stablecoin design and regulation are highly relevant for related innovations in decentralized finance (DeFi), nonfungible tokens, and Web3 protocols. In this review, we describe the following: key stablecoin design choices, from reserve composition to stability mechanism; legal claim against the issuer; noninterference with macroeconomic stability; and interoperability with public sector payment rails and central bank digital currencies. Last, we cover the key benefits of stablecoins in the context of real-time, low-cost programmable payments, financial inclusion, and DeFi.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-111621-101151
2022-11-01
2025-02-24
The full text of this item is not currently available.

Literature Cited

  1. Adrian T, Mancini-Griffoli T. 2019. The rise of digital money. Int. Monet. Fund FinTech Notes, July 15. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/fintech-notes/Issues/2019/07/12/The-Rise-of-Digital-Money-47097
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Auer R, Cornelli G, Frost J. 2020. Rise of the central bank digital currencies: drivers, approaches and technologies Work. Pap. 880 Bank Int. Settl. Basel, Switz:.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Banerjee A, Duflo E, Glennerster R, Kinman C. 2015. The miracle of microfinance? Evidence from a randomized evaluation. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 7:122–53
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bank of England 2020. Central bank digital currency: opportunities, challenges and design Discuss. Pap., March 12 Bank of England London:
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bank of Israel 2018. Report of the team to examine the issue of central bank digital currencies Tech. Rep. Bank of Israel Jerusalem:
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Banque de France 2020. Central bank digital currency Tech. Rep. Banque de France Paris:
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Barnett C, Dowling M. 2020. the wildcat era of stablecoins, commercial banks have new rails to ride. CoinDesk, June 16. https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2020/06/16/in-the-wildcat-era-of-stablecoins-commercial-banks-have-new-rails-to-ride/
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Barontini C, Holden H. 2019. Proceeding with caution—a survey on central bank digital currency Work. Pap. 101 Bank Int. Settl. Basel, Switz:.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Baydakova A. 2019. Millions in crypto is crossing the Russia-China border daily. There, tether is king. CoinDesk, July 30. https://www.coindesk.com/business/2019/07/30/millions-in-crypto-is-crossing-the-russia-china-border-daily-there-tether-is-king/
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Benigno P, Schilling LM, Uhlig H. 2019. Cryptocurrencies, currency competition, and the impossible trinity NBER Work Pap. 26214
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Boar C, Holden H, Wadsworth A. 2020. Impending arrival—a sequel to the survey on central bank digital currency Work. Pap. 107 Bank Int. Settl. Basel, Switz:.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bordo MD, Levin AT. 2017. Central bank digital currency and the future of monetary policy NBER Work Pap. 23711
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Brunnermeier MK, James H, Landau JP. 2019. The digitalization of money NBER Work. Pap. 26300
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Catalini C, de Gortari A. 2021. On the economic design of stablecoins SSRN Work Pap. 3899499
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Catalini C, Gans JS. 2019. Initial coin offerings and the value of crypto tokens NBER Work Pap. 24418
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Catalini C, Gans JS. 2020. Some simple economics of the blockchain. Commun. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 63:780–90
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Catalini C, Li WD, de Gortari A, Lilley A. 2021. From stablecoins to CBDCs: the public benefits of a public-private partnership. SSRN Work Pap. 3986192
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Catalini C, Lilley A. 2021. Why is the United States lagging behind in payments? SSRN Work Pap. 3893937
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Catalini C, Massari J. 2021. Stablecoins and the future of money. Harvard Bus. Rev., Aug. 10. https://hbr.org/2021/08/stablecoins-and-the-future-of-money
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Catalini C, Shah N. 2021. Setting standards for stablecoin reserves. SSRN Work Pap. 3970885
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Cecchetti S, Schienholtz K. 2019. Libra: a dramatic call to regulatory action. VoxEU.org, Aug. 28. https://voxeu.org/article/libra-dramatic-call-regulatory-action
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Chainalysis 2020. The 2020 geography of cryptocurrency report Tech. Rep. Sept., Chainalysis New York:
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Chalkias K, Lewi K, Mohassel P, Nikolaenko V. 2020. Distributed auditing proofs of liabilities. Presented at the 3rd ZKProof Workshop https://research.facebook.com/file/593824151622372/Distributed-Auditing-Proofs-of-Liabilities.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Comm. Paym. Market Infrastruct 2018. Central bank digital currencies Rep. Bank Int. Settl. Basel, Switz:.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Duffie D 2020. Interoperable payment systems and the role of central bank digital currencies. SSRN Work Pap. 3604665
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Fengler W. 2012. How Kenya became a world leader for mobile money. World Bank Blogs, Africa Can End Poverty, July 16. https://blogs.worldbank.org/africacan/how-kenya-became-a-world-leader-for-mobile-money
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Financ. Stab. Board 2020. Regulation, supervision and oversight of “global stablecoin” arrangements Tech. Rep. Financ. Stab. Board Basel, Switz:.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. G7 Work. Group Stablecoins 2019. Investigating the impact of global stablecoins Comm. Paym. Market Infra-struct. Pap. 187 Bank Int. Settl. Basel, Switz:.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Goldstein J. 2020. Money: The True Story of a Made-Up Thing New York: Hachette Books
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Gorton GB, Zhang J. 2021. Taming wildcat stablecoins SSRN Work Pap. 3888752
    [Google Scholar]
  31. [Google Scholar]
  32. Jack W, Ray A, Suri T. 2013. Transaction networks: evidence from mobile money in Kenya. Am. Econ. Rev. 103:3356–61
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Jack W, Suri T. 2011. Mobile money: the economics of M-PESA NBER Work Pap. 16721
    [Google Scholar]
  34. John K, O'Hara M, Saleh F. 2022. Bitcoin and beyond. Annu. Rev. Financ. Econ. 14:95–115
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Kast F, Meier S, Pomeranz D. 2018. Saving more in groups: field experimental evidence from Chile. J. Dev. Econ. 133:275–94
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Kuo E, Iles B, Rincon-Cruz M. 2019. Ampleforth: a new synthetic commodity White Pap. Ampleforth San Francisco: https://ampltools.com/Media/Ampleforth-whitepaper.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Long H, Singletary M. 2020. Glitches prevent $1,200 stimulus checks from reaching millions of Americans. Washington Post Apr. 16. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/04/16/coronavirus-cares-stimulus-check/
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Lyons RK, Viswanath-Natraj G. 2020. What keeps stablecoins stable?. NBER Work Pap. 27136
  39. Nakamoto S. 2008. Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system Tech. Rep. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Narayanan A, Bonneau J, Felten E, Miller A, Goldfeder S. 2016. Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency Technologies Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Off. Monet. Financ. Inst. Forum 2019. Retail CBDCs: the next payments frontier. Rep. Off. Monet. Financ. Inst. Forum London:
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Parker SW, Todd PE. 2017. Conditional cash transfers: the case of Progresa/Oportunidades. J. Econ. Lit. 55:3866–915
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Prasad ES. 2021. The Future of Money: How the Digital Revolution Is Transforming Currencies and Finance Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Pres. Work. Group Financ. Markets 2020. Statement on key regulatory and supervisory issues relevant to certain stablecoins Statement, Pres. Work. Group Financ. Markets, U.S. Dep. Treas. Washington, DC:
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Pres. Work. Group Financ. Markets 2021. Report on stablecoins Tech. Rep. Pres. Work. Group Financ. Markets, U.S. Dep. Treas. Washington, DC:
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Sams R. 2015. A note on cryptocurrency stabilisation: seigniorage shares. Work. Pap. Clearmatics London: https://blog.bitmex.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/A-Note-on-Cryptocurrency-Stabilisation-Seigniorage-Shares.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Scott SV, Van Reenen J, Zachariadis M. 2017. The long-term effect of digital innovation on bank performance: an empirical study of SWIFT adoption in financial services. Res. Policy 46:5984–1004
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Suri T. 2017. Mobile money. Annu. Rev. Econ. 9:497–520
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Suri T, Jack W. 2016. The long-run poverty and gender impacts of mobile money. Science 354:63171288–92
    [Google Scholar]
  50. von Luckner CG, Reinhart CM, Rogoff KS. 2021. Decrypting new age international capital flows NBER Work. Pap. 29337
    [Google Scholar]
  51. World Bank Group 2020. COVID-19 crisis through a migration lens Migr. Dev. Brief 32 World Bank Group Washington, DC:
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-111621-101151
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-111621-101151
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error