1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Sociology
  4. Volume 48, 2022
  5. Article

Annual Review of Sociology

Volume 48, 2022

Zoning, Land Use, and the Reproduction of Urban Inequality

Abstract

Zoning determines what can be built where, and is ubiquitous in the United States. Low-density residential zoning predominates in US cities far more than in other countries, limiting housing opportunities for those who cannot afford large homes. These zoning regulations have racist and classist origins, make housing more expensive, and reinforce segregation patterns. While sociologists study these consequences of zoning, and other causes of unaffordable housing and segregation, they rarely examine zoning itself. This article argues for a sociological research agenda on zoning and land use.

Keyword(s): housing, inequality, land use, segregation, stratification, zoning
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-030420-122027
2022-07-29
2024-06-30
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/soc/48/1/annurev-soc-030420-122027.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-030420-122027&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Alba RD, Logan JR, Stults BJ, Marzan G, Zhang W 1999. Immigrant groups in the suburbs: a reexamination of suburbanization and spatial assimilation. Am. Sociol. Rev. 64:446–60
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Am. Plan. Assoc. 2021. American planning history timeline. Rep., Am. Plan. Assoc Chicago: https://www.planning.org/timeline/
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson E 1990. Streetwise: Race, Class, and Change in an Urban Community Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Anderson E 1999. Code of the Street: Decency, Violence, and the Moral Life of the Inner City New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Badger E, Bui Q. 2019. Cities start to question an American ideal: a house with a yard on every lot. New York Times June 18. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/06/18/upshot/cities-across-america-question-single-family-zoning.html
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Been V, Ellen IG, O'Regan K. 2019. Supply skepticism: housing supply and affordability. Hous. Policy Debate 29:25–40
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Been V, Madar J, McDonnell S. 2014. Urban land-use regulation: Are homevoters overtaking the growth machine?. J. Empir. Leg. Stud. 11:227–65
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Buchanan v. Warley, 245 U.S. 60 1917.)
  9. Cent. Budg. Policy Priorities 2021. Federal rental assistance fact sheets. Cent. Budg. Policy Priorities. https://www.cbpp.org/research/housing/federal-rental-assistance-fact-sheets
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Charles CZ. 2003. The dynamics of racial residential segregation. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 29:167–207
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Chaskin RJ, Joseph ML. 2015. Integrating the Inner City: The Promise and Perils of Mixed-Income Public Housing Transformation Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Chetty R, Hendren N, Katz LF. 2016. The effects of exposure to better neighborhoods on children: new evidence from the Moving to Opportunity experiment. Am. Econ. Rev. 106:855–902
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Clark KB. 1965. Dark Ghetto: Dilemmas of Social Power Middletown, CT: Wesleyan Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  14. DeLuca S, Rosenblatt P. 2017. Walking away from the wire: housing mobility and neighborhood opportunity in Baltimore. Hous. Policy Debate 27:519–46
     [Google Scholar]
  15. DeLuca S, Wood H, Rosenblatt P. 2019. Why poor families move (and where they go): reactive mobility and residential decisions. City Community 18:556–93
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Desmond M. 2012. Eviction and the reproduction of urban poverty. Am. J. Sociol. 118:88–133
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Desmond M. 2016. Evicted: Poverty and Profit in the American City New York: Crown
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Desmond M, Gershenson C. 2017. Who gets evicted? Assessing individual, neighborhood, and network factors. Soc. Sci. Res. 62:362–77
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Dillon L, Luna T 2020. California bill to dramatically increase home building fails for the third year in a row. Los Angeles Times Jan. 30. https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-01-29/high-profile-california-housing-bill-to-allow-mid-rise-apartments-near-transit-falls-short
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Drake SC, Cayton HR. 1945. Black Metropolis: A Study of Negro Life in a Northern City Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Du Bois WEB. 1899. The Philadelphia Negro New York: Cosimo, Inc.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Duncan OD, Duncan B. 1955. A methodological analysis of segregation indexes. Am. Sociol. Rev. 20:210–17
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Engels F. 1872. The Housing Question Moscow: Progress
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Fairfield JD. 1994. The scientific management of urban space: professional city planning and the legacy of progressive reform. J. Urban Hist. 20:179–204
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Farley R. 1977. Residential segregation in urbanized areas of the United States in 1970: an analysis of social class and racial differences. Demography 14:497–518
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Fischel WA. 2004. An economic history of zoning and a cure for its exclusionary effects. Urban Stud 41:317–40
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Fischel WA. 2009. The Homevoter Hypothesis Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Fischel WA. 2015. Zoning Rules! The Economics of Land Use Regulation Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Inst. Land Policy
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Fischler R. 1998. Health, safety, and the general welfare: markets, politics, and social science in early land-use regulation and community design. J. Urban Hist. 24:675–719
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Foley DL. 1980. The sociology of housing. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 6:457–78
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Freeman L. 2006. There Goes the Hood: Views of Gentrification from the Ground Up Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Gabbe CJ. 2018. Why are regulations changed? A parcel analysis of upzoning in Los Angeles. J. Plan. Educ. Res. 38:289–300
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Gans HJ. 1969. Planning for people, not buildings. Environ. Plan. A 1:33–46
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Gans HJ. 1994. People, Plans, and Policies: Essays on Poverty, Racism, and Other National Urban Problems New York: Columbia Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Gilderbloom JI, Appelbaum RP. 1987. Toward a sociology of rent: Are rental housing markets competitive?. Soc. Probl. 34:261–76
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Glaeser EL, Gyourko J. 2002. The impact of zoning on housing affordability NBER Work. Pap8835
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Gyourko J, Saiz A, Summers A. 2008. A new measure of the local regulatory environment for housing markets: the Wharton Residential Land Use Regulatory Index. Urban Stud 45:693–729
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Hankey S, Marshall JD. 2010. Impacts of urban form on future US passenger-vehicle greenhouse gas emissions. Energy Policy 38:4880–87
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Hannerz U. 1970. Soulside: Inquiries into Ghetto Culture and Community Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Harvey H. 2020. Cumulative effects of doubling up in childhood on young adult outcomes. Demography 57:501–28
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Hirt SA. 2015. Zoned in the USA: The Origins and Implications of American Land-Use Regulation Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Hyra DS. 2017. Race, Class, and Politics in the Cappuccino City Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Jerolmack C, Walker ET. 2018. Please in my backyard: quiet mobilization in support of fracking in an Appalachian community. Am. J. Sociol. 124:479–516
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Kahn ME, Vaughn R, Zasloff J 2010. The housing market effects of discrete land use regulations: evidence from the California coastal boundary zone. J. Hous. Econ. 19:269–79
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Kok N, Monkkonen P, Quigley JM. 2014. Land use regulations and the value of land and housing: an intra-metropolitan analysis. J. Urban Econ. 81:136–48
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Kotlowitz A. 1991. There Are No Children Here: The Story of Two Boys Growing Up in the Other America New York: Knopf Doubleday
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Kuhlmann D. 2021. Upzoning and single-family housing prices. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 87:383–95
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Kurwa R. 2015. Deconcentration without integration: examining the social outcomes of housing choice voucher movement in Los Angeles County. City Community 14:364–91
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Lens MC, Monkkonen P. 2016. Do strict land use regulations make metropolitan areas more segregated by income?. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 82:6–21
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Levine JR. 2021. Constructing Community: Urban Governance, Development, and Inequality in Boston Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Liebow E. 1967. Tally's Corner: A Study of Negro Streetcorner Men Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Logan JR, Molotch HL. 1987. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Logan JR, Stults BJ, Farley R. 2004. Segregation of minorities in the metropolis: two decades of change. Demography 41:1–22
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Manville M. 2013. Parking requirements and housing development. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 79:49–66
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Manville M, Monkkonen P, Lens MC 2020. It's time to end single-family zoning. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 86:106–12
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Manville M, Osman T. 2017. Motivations for growth revolts: discretion and pretext as sources of development conflict. City Community 16:66–85
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Massey DS, Albright L, Casciano R, Derickson E, Kinsey DN 2013. Climbing Mount Laurel: The Struggle for Affordable Housing and Social Mobility in an American Suburb Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Massey DS, Denton NA. 1988. The dimensions of residential segregation. Soc. Forces 67:281–315
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Massey DS, Denton NA. 1993. American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Massey DS, Rugh JS. 2017. The intersection of race and class: zoning, affordable housing, and segregation in U.S. metropolitan areas. The Fight for Fair Housing: Causes, Consequences, and Future Implications of the 1968 Federal Fair Housing Act GD Squires 245–65 London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Molotch H. 1970. Oil in Santa Barbara and power in America. Sociol. Inq. 40:131–44
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Monkkonen P. 2019. The elephant in the zoning code: single family zoning in the housing supply discussion. Hous. Policy Debate 29:41–43
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Monkkonen P, Lens MC, Manville M. 2020. Built out cities: how California cities restrict housing production through prohibition and process. Work Pap., Terner Cent. Hous. Innov., Univ. Calif Berkeley:
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Muñiz I, Rojas C. 2019. Urban form and spatial structure as determinants of per capita greenhouse gas emissions considering possible endogeneity and compensation behaviors. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 76:79–87
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Murray C, Schuetz J. 2019. Is California's apartment market broken? Work Pap., Terner Cent. Hous. Innov., Univ. Calif Berkeley:
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Park Mesa Heights Comm. Counc. 2020. End of single family zoning runs out of time. Park Mesa Heights Community Council Blog Sept 2: https://parkmesaheights.org/2020/09/end-of-single-family-zoning-runs-out-of-time/
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Park RE, Burgess EW. 1925. The City Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Pattillo M. 2007. Black on the Block: The Politics of Race and Class in the City Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Pattillo M. 2013. Housing: commodity versus right. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 39:509–31
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Pendall R. 2000. Why voucher and certificate users live in distressed neighborhoods. Hous. Policy Debate 11:881–910
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Pendall R, Wegmann J, Martin J, Wei D 2018. The growth of control? Changes in local land-use regulation in major U.S. metropolitan areas from 1994 to 2003. Hous. Policy Debate 28:901–19
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Phillips S. 2020. Does the Los Angeles region have too many vacant homes? Work. Pap., UCLA Lewis Cent. Reg. Policy Stud., Univ. Calif Los Angeles: https://www.lewis.ucla.edu/research/does-the-los-angeles-region-have-too-many-vacant-homes
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Rainwater L. 1970. Behind Ghetto Walls Piscataway, NJ: Transaction
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Reardon SF, Bischoff K. 2011. Income inequality and income segregation. Am. J. Sociol. 116:1092–153
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Reardon SF, O'Sullivan D. 2004. Measures of spatial segregation. Sociol. Methodol. 34:121–62
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Riis JA. 1890. How the Other Half Lives: Studies Among the Tenements of New York New York: C. Scribner's Sons
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Rodríguez-Pose A, Storper M. 2020. Housing, urban growth and inequalities: the limits to deregulation and upzoning in reducing economic and spatial inequality. Urban Stud 57:223–48
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Rothstein R. 2017. The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America New York: Liveright
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Rothwell JT, Massey DS. 2009. The effect of density zoning on racial segregation in U.S. urban areas. Urban Aff. Rev. 44:779–806
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Rothwell JT, Massey DS. 2010. Density zoning and class segregation in U.S. metropolitan areas. Soc. Sci. Q. 91:1123–43
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Rugh JS, Massey DS. 2014. Segregation in post-civil rights America: stalled integration or end of the segregated century?. Du Bois Rev. 11:205–32
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Saiz A. 2010. The geographic determinants of housing supply. Q. J. Econ. 125:1253–96
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Sampson RJ. 2012. Great American City: Chicago and the Enduring Neighborhood Effect Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Sanbonmatsu L, Katz LF, Ludwig J, Gennetian LA, Duncan GJ et al. 2011. Moving to Opportunity for Fair Housing Demonstration Program—final impacts evaluation. Rep., U.S. Dep. Hous. Urban Dev Washington, DC:
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Schlereth TJ. 1981. Burnham's plan and Moody's manual city planning as progressive reform. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 47:70–82
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Sharkey P. 2013. Stuck in Place: Urban Neighborhoods and the End of Progress Toward Racial Equality Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Sharkey P, Faber JW. 2014. Where, when, why, and for whom do residential contexts matter? Moving away from the dichotomous understanding of neighborhood effects. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 40:559–79
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 1948.)
  89. Shertzer A, Twinam T, Walsh RP. 2016. Race, ethnicity, and discriminatory zoning. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 8:217–46
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Shertzer A, Twinam T, Walsh RP. 2018. Zoning and the economic geography of cities. J. Urban Econ. 105:20–39
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Silver C. 1991. The racial origins of zoning: Southern cities from 1910–40. Plan. Perspect. 6:189–205
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Steil J, Charles CZ 2021. Sociology, segregation, and the Fair Housing Act. . In Perspectives on Fair Housing VJ Reina, WE Pritchett, SM Wachter 45–73 Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Stuart F. 2016. Down, Out, and Under Arrest: Policing and Everyday Life in Skid Row Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Sulaiman S. 2020. CIM Group abandons effort to buy Crenshaw Mall; community members take victory lap, plan next steps. Streetsblog Los Angeles Blog June 18. https://la.streetsblog.org/2020/06/18/cim-group-abandons-effort-to-buy-crenshaw-mall-community-members-take-victory-lap-plan-next-steps/
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Sullivan ML. 1989. “Getting Paid”: Youth Crime and Work in the Inner City Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Terner Cent. Hous. Innov. 2019. Land use in California Rep., Terner Cent. Hous. Innov., Univ. Calif Berkeley: https://californialanduse.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Venkatesh S. 2001. Chicago's pragmatic planners: American sociology and the myth of community. Soc. Sci. Hist. 25:275–317
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Venkatesh SA. 2000. American Project Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Venkatesh SA. 2008. Gang Leader for a Day: A Rogue Sociologist Takes to the Streets New York: Penguin
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Venkatesh SA. 2009. Off the Books: The Underground Economy of the Urban Poor Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U.S. 365 1926.)
  102. von Hoffman A. 2009. Housing and planning: a century of social reform and local power. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 75:231–44
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Warner K, Molotch H 1995. Power to build: how development persists despite local controls. Urban Aff. Q. 30:378–406
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Wilson WJ. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy, Second Edition Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Winship C. 1977. A revaluation of indexes of residential segregation. Soc. Forces 55:1058–66
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Zukin S. 2016. Gentrification in three paradoxes. City Community 15:202–7
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-030420-122027
Loading
Zoning, Land Use, and the Reproduction of Urban Inequality
Annual Review of Sociology 48, 421 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-030420-122027
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-030420-122027
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-030420-122027
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error