Itinerant Objects

Literature Cited

1. Alberti B. 2016. Archaeologies of ontology. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 45:163–79
   [Google Scholar]
2. Alberti B, Fowles S, Holbraad M, Marshall Y, Witmore C 2011. “Worlds otherwise”: archaeology, anthropology, and ontological difference. Curr. Anthropol. 52:6896–912
   [Google Scholar]
3. Appadurai A. 1986a. Introduction: commodities and the politics of value. See Appadurai 1986b 3–63
4. Appadurai A 1986b. The Social Life of Things. Commodities in Cultural Perspective Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
   [Google Scholar]
5. Artioli G 2010. Scientific Methods and Cultural Heritage: An Introduction to the Application of Materials Science to Archaeometry and Conservation Science Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
   [Google Scholar]
6. Barad K. 2003. Posthumanist performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs 28:801–31
   [Google Scholar]
7. Barad K. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bauer AA, Agbe-Davies AS. 2010. Social Archaeologies of Trade and Exchange Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press
   [Google Scholar]
9. Beaudry MC, Parno TG 2013. Archaeologies of Mobility and Movement New York: Springer
   [Google Scholar]
10. Benjamin W. 1968. 1955. Illuminations: Essays and Reflections H Arendt New York: Shocken
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bennett J. 2005. The agency of assemblages and the North American blackout. Public Cult 17:3445–65
    [Google Scholar]
12. Bennett J. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
13. Bille M, Hastrup F, Sørensen TF 2010. An Anthropology of Absence: Materializations of Transcendence and Loss New York: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
14. Binford LR. 1981. Behavioral archaeology and the “Pompeii premise. J. Anthropol. Res. 37:195–208
    [Google Scholar]
15. Blair EH. 2015. Glass beads and global itineraries. See Joyce & Gillespie 2015b 81–99
16. Blanco-González A. 2014. Tracking the social lives of things: biographical insights into Bronze Age pottery in Spain. Antiquity 88:340441–55
    [Google Scholar]
17. Bourdieu P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
18. Bourdieu P. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste transl. R Nice Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
19. Braudel F. 1972. 1949. The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Phillip II 2 vols., transl. S Reynolds London: Collins
    [Google Scholar]
20. Bray F. 2013. Gender and technology. Women, Science, and Technology: A Reader in Feminist Science Studies M Wyer, M Barbercheck, D Cookmeyer, HÖ Öztürk, M Wayne 370–84 New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
21. Bray TL. 2012. Ritual commensality between human and non-human persons: investigating native ontologies in the Late Pre-Columbian Andean world. Between Feasts and Daily Meals: Towards an Archaeology of Commensal Spaces S Pollock. eTopoi (Spec. Vol.) 2197–212
    [Google Scholar]
22. Brown B. 2003. A Sense of Things: The Object Matter of American Literature Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
23. Brown B. 2015. Other Things Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
24. Callon M. 1986. Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of Saint Brieuc Bay. Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? J Law 196–233 London: Routledge and Kegan Paul
    [Google Scholar]
25. Chapman JC. 2000. Fragmentation in Archaeology: People, Places and Broken Objects in the Prehistory of South-Eastern Europe London: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
26. Chapman J, Gaydarska B. 2007. Parts and Wholes: Fragmentation in Prehistoric Context Oxford, UK: Oxbow
    [Google Scholar]
27. Childe VG. 1951. 1936. Man Makes Himself New York: Penguin
    [Google Scholar]
28. Clifford J. 1997. Routes: Travel and Translation in the Late Twentieth Century Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
29. Coole D, Frost S 2010. New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
30. Crossland Z, Bauer A. 2017. Im/materialities: things and signs. Semiot. Rev. 2017:4 https://semioticreview.com/ojs/index.php/sr/article/view/9
    [Google Scholar]
31. DeBoer W. 1990. Interaction, imitation, and communication as expressed in style: the Ucayali experience. The Uses of Style in Archaeology MW Conkey, CA Hastorf 82–104 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
32. Deetz J. 1977. In Small Things Forgotten: An Archaeology of Early American Life Garden City, NY: Anchor
    [Google Scholar]
33. Deleuze G, Guattari F. 1987. 1980. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia transl. B Massumi Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
    [Google Scholar]
34. Dietler M, Herbich I. 1998. Habitus, techniques, style: an integrated approach to the social understanding of material culture and boundaries. See Stark 1998 232–63
35. Dobres M-A. 1995. Gender and prehistoric technology: on the social agency of technical strategies. World Archaeol 27:125–49
    [Google Scholar]
36. Dobres M-A. 1999. Technology's links and chaînes: the processual unfolding of technique and technician. The Social Dynamics of Technology: Practice, Politics, and Worldviews MA Dobres, CR Hoffman 124–45 Washington, DC: Smithson. Inst. Press
    [Google Scholar]
37. Dobres M-A. 2000. Technology and Social Agency: Outlining a Practice Framework for Archaeology Oxford, UK: Blackwell
    [Google Scholar]
38. Dobres M-A, Robb JE 2000. Agency in Archaeology London: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
39. Dobres M-A, Robb JE. 2005. “Doing agency”: introductory remarks on methodology. J. Archaeol. Method Theory 12:159–66
    [Google Scholar]
40. Dornan JL. 2002. Agency and archaeology: past, present, and future directions. J. Archaeol. Method Theory 9:303–29
    [Google Scholar]
41. Douglas M, Isherwood B. 1979. The World of Goods: Towards an Anthropology of Consumption London: Allen Lane
    [Google Scholar]
42. Eco U. 1986. Travels in Hyperreality New York: Harcourt
    [Google Scholar]
43. Faulkner W. 1951. Requiem for a Nun New York: Random House
    [Google Scholar]
44. Flannery KV. 1967. Cultural history versus cultural process: a debate in American archaeology. Sci. Am. 217:2119–27
    [Google Scholar]
45. Fontijn DR. 2002. Sacrificial Landscapes: Cultural Biographies of Persons, Objects and ‘Natural’ Places in the Bronze Age of the Southern Netherlands, c. 2300–600BC Analecta Praehist. Leiden. 33/34 Leiden, Neth: Facult. Archaeol., Univ. Leiden
    [Google Scholar]
46. Fowler C. 2004. The Archaeology of Personhood: An Anthropological Approach London: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
47. Fowles S. 2010. People without things. See Bille et al. 2010 23–41
48. Funari PP. 2006. The World Archaeological Congress from a critical and personal perspective. Archaeologies 2:173–79
    [Google Scholar]
49. Gell A. 1998. Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
50. Gibson JJ. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception Boston: Houghton Mifflin
    [Google Scholar]
51. Giddens A. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
    [Google Scholar]
52. Gillespie SD. 2015. Journey's end (?): the travels of La Venta Offering 4. See Joyce & Gillespie 2015b 39–62
53. Glassie H. 1969. Pattern in the Material Folk Culture of the Eastern United States Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
    [Google Scholar]
54. Gosden C. 2001. Making sense: archaeology and aesthetics. World Archaeol 33:163–67
    [Google Scholar]
55. Gosden C. 2005. What do objects want. J. Archaeol. Method Theory 12:3193–211
    [Google Scholar]
56. Gosden C. 2006. Material culture and long-term change. See Tilley et al. 2006 425–42
57. Gosden C, Marshall Y. 1999. The cultural biography of objects. World Archaeol 31:2169–78
    [Google Scholar]
58. Hahn HP, Weiss H 2013. Mobility, Meaning and Transformations of Things: Shifting Contexts of Material Culture Through Time and Space Oxford, UK: Oxbow
    [Google Scholar]
59. Hamilakis Y. 1999. Stories from exile: fragments from the cultural biography of the Parthenon (or ‘Elgin’) marbles. World Archaeol 31:2303–20
    [Google Scholar]
60. Handler R. 2003. Cultural property and culture theory. J. Soc. Archaeol. 3:353–65
    [Google Scholar]
61. Haraway D. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
62. Harding A. 2016. Introduction: biographies of things. Distant Worlds J 2016:1 https://doi.org/10.11588/dwj.2016.1.30158
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
63. Harrison-Buck E, Hendon JA 2018. Relational Identities and Other-Than-Human-Agency in Archaeology Louisville: Univ. Colo. Press
    [Google Scholar]
64. Hegmon M. 1992. Archaeological research on style. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 21:517–36
    [Google Scholar]
65. Hegmon M. 1998. Technology, style, and social practices: archaeological approaches. See Stark 1998 264–79
66. Heidegger M. 1971. The thing. Poetry, Language, Thought transl. A Hofstadter 163–80 New York: Harper & Row
    [Google Scholar]
67. Henderson J. 2000. The Science and Archaeology of Materials: An Investigation of Inorganic Materials London: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
68. Hicks D. 2004. Historical archaeology and the British. Camb. Archaeol. J. 14:1101–6
    [Google Scholar]
69. Hodder I. 1985. Boundaries as strategies: an ethnoarchaeological study. The Archaeology of Frontiers and Boundaries SW Green, SM Perlman 141–59 New York: Academic
    [Google Scholar]
70. Hodder I. 1989. Writing archaeology: site reports in context. Antiquity 63:268–74
    [Google Scholar]
71. Hodder I. 1990. The Domestication of Europe Oxford, UK: Blackwell
    [Google Scholar]
72. Hodder I. 1992. Material practice, symbolism and ideology. Theory and Practice in Archaeology I Hodder 201–12 London: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
73. Hodder I. 2011. Human-thing entanglement: towards an integrated archaeological perspective. J. R. Anthropol. Inst. 17:154–77
    [Google Scholar]
74. Hodder I. 2012. Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relations Between Humans and Things Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell
    [Google Scholar]
75. Hodder I. 2014. The entanglements of humans and things: a long-term view. New Lit. Hist. 45:119–36
    [Google Scholar]
76. Hodder I, Mol A. 2016. Network analysis and entanglement. J. Archaeol. Method Theory 23:11066–94
    [Google Scholar]
77. Hollin G, Forsyth I, Giraud E, Potts T 2017. (Dis)entangling Barad: materialisms and ethics. Soc. Stud. Sci. 47:6918–41
    [Google Scholar]
78. Holtorf CJ. 1998. The life-histories of megaliths in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (Germany). World Archaeol 30:123–38
    [Google Scholar]
79. Holtorf CJ. 2002. Notes on the life history of a pot sherd. J. Mater. Cult. 7:149–71
    [Google Scholar]
80. Hoskins J. 1998. Biographical Objects: How Things Tell the Stories of People's Lives London: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
81. Hoskins J. 2006. Agency, biography and objects. See Tilley et al. 2006 74–84
82. Hutson SR. 2010. Dwelling, Identity, and the Maya: Relational Archaeology at Chunchucmil Lanham, MD: Altamira
    [Google Scholar]
83. Ingold T. 1992. Culture and the perception of the environment. Bush Base: Forest Farm. Culture, Environment and Development E Croll, D Parkin 39–56 London: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
84. Ingold T. 1993. The art of translation in a continuous world. Beyond Boundaries: Understanding, Translation and Anthropological Discourse G Pálsson 210–30 Oxford, UK: Berg
    [Google Scholar]
85. Ingold T. 2000. The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill London: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
86. Ingold T. 2007a. Lines: A Brief History London: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
87. Ingold T. 2007b. Materials against materiality. Archaeol. Dialogues 14:11–16
    [Google Scholar]
88. Ingold T. 2008. When ANT meets SPIDER: social theory for arthropods. See Knappett & Malafouris 2008 209–15
89. Ingold T. 2010. Bringing things to life: creative entanglements in a world of materials Natl. Cent. Res. Methods (NCRM) Work. Pap. Ser. 05/10, Morgan Cent., Univ. Manch. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/1306/
    [Google Scholar]
90. Ingold T. 2011. Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge, and Description London: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
91. Joy J. 2009. Reinvigorating object biography: reproducing the drama of object lives. World Archaeol 41:4540–56
    [Google Scholar]
92. Joyce RA. 2012a. From place to place: provenience, provenance, and archaeology. Provenance: An Alternate History of Art G Feigenbaum, I Reist 48–60 Los Angeles: Getty Res. Inst.
    [Google Scholar]
93. Joyce RA. 2012b. Life with things: archaeology and materiality. Archaeology and Anthropology: Past, Present and Future D Shankland 119–32 Oxford, UK: Berg
    [Google Scholar]
94. Joyce RA. 2015. Things in motion: itineraries of Ulua marble vases. See Joyce & Gillespie 2015b 21–38
95. Joyce RA, Gillespie SD. 2015a. Making things out of objects that move. See Joyce & Gillespie 2015b 3–19
96. Joyce RA, Gillespie SD 2015b. Things in Motion: Object Itineraries in Anthropological Practice Santa Fe, NM: Sch. Adv. Res. Press
    [Google Scholar]
97. Joyce RA, Lopiparo J. 2005. PostScript: doing agency in archaeology. J. Archaeol. Method Theory 12:365–74
    [Google Scholar]
98. Keane W. 2003. Semiotics and the social analysis of material things. Lang. Commun. 23:409–25
    [Google Scholar]
99. Keane W. 2005. Signs are not the garb of meaning: on the social analysis of material things. Materiality: Politics, History, and Culture D Miller 182–205 Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
100. Keane W. 2018a. A minimalist ontology, with other people in it. HAU 8:1/245–47
     [Google Scholar]
101. Keane W. 2018b. Perspectives on affordances, or the anthropologically real: The 2018 Daryll Forde Lecture. HAU 8:1/227–38
     [Google Scholar]
102. Knappett C. 2002. Photographs, skeuomorphs and marionettes: some thoughts on mind, agency and object. J. Mater. Cult. 7:197–117
     [Google Scholar]
103. Knappett C. 2004. The affordances of things: a post-Gibsonian perspective on the relationality of mind and matter. Rethinking Materiality: The Engagement of Mind with the Material World E DeMarrais, C Gosden, C Renfrew 43–51 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
104. Knappett C. 2005. Thinking Through Material Culture: An Interdisciplinary Perspective Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
     [Google Scholar]
105. Knappett C. 2008. The neglected networks of material agency: artefacts, pictures and texts. See Knappett & Malafouris 2008 139–56
106. Knappett C. 2011. An Archaeology of Interaction: Network Perspectives on Material Culture and Society Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
107. Knappett C. 2012. Meaning in miniature: semiotic networks in material culture. Excavating the Mind: Cross-Sections Through Culture, Cognition, and Materiality N Johansen, M Jessen, HJ Jensen 87–109 Aarhus, Den: Aarhus Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
108. Knappett C. 2013a. Imprints as punctuations of material itineraries. See Hahn & Weiss 2013 37–49
109. Knappett C 2013b. Network Analysis in Archaeology: New Approaches to Regional Interaction Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
110. Knappett C, Malafouris L 2008. Material Agency: Towards a Non-Anthropocentric Approach New York: Springer
     [Google Scholar]
111. Kopytoff I. 1986. The cultural biography of things: commoditization as process. See Appadurai 1986b 64–91
112. Küchler S. 2003. Imaging the body politic: the knot in Pacific imagination. Homme 165:205–22
     [Google Scholar]
113. Latour B. 1988. The Pasteurization of France transl. A Sheridan, J Law Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
114. Latour B. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern transl. C Porter London: Harvester
     [Google Scholar]
115. Latour B. 1996. On actor-network theory: a few clarifications. Soz. Welt 47:4369–81
     [Google Scholar]
116. Latour B. 1999. Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
117. Latour B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
118. Law J. 1986. On the methods of long distance control: vessels, navigation and the Portuguese route to India. Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? J Law 234–63 London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
119. Leacock E. 1978. Women's status in egalitarian society: implications for social evolution. Curr. Anthropol. 19:247–75
     [Google Scholar]
120. Leary J 2014. Past Mobilities: Archaeological Approaches to Movement and Mobility Farnham, UK: Ashgate
     [Google Scholar]
121. Lechtman H. 1977. Style in technology—some early thoughts. Material Culture: Styles, Organization, and Dynamics of Technology H Lechtman, RS Merrill 3–20 St. Paul, MN: West
     [Google Scholar]
122. Lemonnier P. 1976. La description des chaînesopératiores: contribution à l'analyse des systèmes techniques. Tech. Cult. 1:100–51
     [Google Scholar]
123. Lemonnier P. 1992. Elements for an Anthropology of Technology Anthropol. Pap. Mus. Anthropol. 88 Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
     [Google Scholar]
124. Lemonnier P 1993. Technological Choices: Transformations in Material Cultures Since the Neolithic London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
125. Lemonnier P. 1996. Et pourtant ça vole! L'ethnologie des techniques et les objets industrials. Ethnol. Fr. 26:117–31
     [Google Scholar]
126. Leroi-Gourhan A. 1964 (1993). Le geste et la parole I and II transl AB Berger Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
     [Google Scholar]
127. Little BJ, Shackel PA 2007. Archaeology as a Tool of Civic Engagement Lanham, MD: Altamira
     [Google Scholar]
128. Lucas G. 2001. Destruction and the rhetoric of excavation. Nor. Archaeol. Rev. 34:35–46
     [Google Scholar]
129. Lucas G. 2012. Understanding the Archaeological Record New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
130. Lydon J, Rizvi UZ 2010. Handbook of Postcolonial Archaeology Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast
     [Google Scholar]
131. MacKenzie MA 1991. Androgynous Objects Amsterdam: Harwood Acad.
     [Google Scholar]
132. Malafouris L. 2008. Is it ‘me’ or is it ‘mine’? The Mycenaean sword as a body-part. Past Bodies J Robb, D Boric 115–23 Oxford, UK: Oxbow Books
     [Google Scholar]
133. Malinowski B. 1922. Argonauts of the Western Pacific London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
134. Marshall Y. 2002. What is community archaeology. World Archaeol 34:2211–19
     [Google Scholar]
135. Marshall Y. 2008. The social lives of lived and inscribed objects: a Lapita perspective. J. Polyn. Soc. 117:159–101
     [Google Scholar]
136. Marshall Y, Alberti B. 2014. A matter of difference: Karen Barad, ontology and archaeological bodies. Camb. Archaeol. J. 24:119–36
     [Google Scholar]
137. Mauss M. 1954. 1924. The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies transl. I Cunnison Glencoe, IL: Free Press
     [Google Scholar]
138. Meskell L. 2004. Object Worlds in Ancient Egypt: Material Biographies Past and Present Oxford, UK: Berg
     [Google Scholar]
139. Meskell L 2005. Archaeologies of Materiality Oxford, UK: Blackwell
     [Google Scholar]
140. Miller D. 1987. Material Culture and Mass Consumption Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell
     [Google Scholar]
141. Mills BJ. 2017. Social network analysis in archaeology. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 46:379–97
     [Google Scholar]
142. Munn ND. 1983. Gawan kula: spatiotemporal control and the symbolism of influence. The Kula: New Perspectives in Massim Exchange JW Leach, E Leach 277–308 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
143. Munn ND. 1986. The Fame of Gawa: A Symbolic Study of Value Transformation in a Massim (Papua New Guinea) Society Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
144. Olsen B. 2003. Material culture after text: re-membering things. Nor. Archaeol. Rev. 36:87–104
     [Google Scholar]
145. Olsen B. 2010. In Defense of Things: Archaeology and the Ontology of Objects Lanham, MD: Altamira
     [Google Scholar]
146. Preucel RW. 2012. Archaeology and the limitations of actor network theory Paper presented to the Department of Anthropology Harvard University Cambridge, MA: Oct. 10. https://www.academia.edu/10272554/
     [Google Scholar]
147. Preucel RW, Mrozowski SA 2010. Contemporary Archaeology in Theory: The New Pragmatism Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell
     [Google Scholar]
148. Pyburn KA. 2003. Archaeology for a new millennium: the rules of engagement. Archaeologists and Local Communities: Partners in Exploring the Past L Derry, M Molloy 167–79 Washington, DC: Soc. Am. Archaeol.
     [Google Scholar]
149. Roddick AA. 2015. Geologies in motion itineraries of stone, clay, and pots in the Lake Titicaca Basin. See Joyce & Gillespie 2015b 123–46
150. Sackett JR. 1982. Approaches to style in lithic archaeology. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 1:59–112
     [Google Scholar]
151. Schiffer MB. 1976. Behavioral Archaeology New York: Academic
     [Google Scholar]
152. Schiffer MB. 1987. Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record Albuquerque: Univ. N. M. Press
     [Google Scholar]
153. Schiffer MB 2001. Anthropological Perspectives on Technology Amerind Found. New World Stud. Ser. 5 Albuquerque: Univ. N. M. Press
     [Google Scholar]
154. Shanks M. 2007. Symmetrical archaeology. World Archaeol 39:4589–96
     [Google Scholar]
155. Shanks M, Tilley C. 1987. Re-Constructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
156. Simmel G. 1978. The Philosophy of Money London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
157. Skeates R. 1995. Animate objects: a biography of prehistoric ‘axe-amulets’ in the central Mediterranean region. Proc. Prehist. Soc. 61:279–301
     [Google Scholar]
158. Smith L. 2006. Uses of Heritage London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
159. Sørensen TF. 2013. We have never been Latourian: archaeological ethics and the posthuman condition. Nor. Archaeol. Rev. 46:11–18
     [Google Scholar]
160. Stark MT 1998. The Archaeology of Social Boundaries Washington, DC: Smithson. Inst. Press
     [Google Scholar]
161. Strathern M. 1984. Subject or object? Women and the circulation of valuables in Highlands New Guinea. Women and Property—Women as Property R Hirschon 158–75 London: Croom Helm
     [Google Scholar]
162. Strathern M. 1988. The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
163. Tambiah SJ. 1984. The Buddhist Saints of the Forest and the Cults of Amulets: A Study in Charisma, Hagiography, Sectarianism and Millennial Buddhism New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
164. Thomas N. 1991. Entangled Objects: Exchange, Material Culture, and Colonialism in the Pacific Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
165. Tilley C, Keane W, Küchler S, Rowlands M, Spyer P 2006. Handbook of Material Culture London: Sage
     [Google Scholar]
166. Ucko P. 1987. Academic Freedom and Apartheid: The Story of the World Archaeological Congress London: Duckworth
     [Google Scholar]
167. Union Station 2016. Union Station announces historic North American tour of Pompeii: The Exhibition. Press Release, Sept. 7. https://www.unionstation.org/news/union-station-announces-historic-north-american-tour-pompeii-exhibition
     [Google Scholar]
168. Van Dyke RM 2015. Practicing Materiality Tucson: Univ. Ariz. Press
     [Google Scholar]
169. Vandiver P. 2001. The role of materials research in ceramics and archaeology. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 31:1373–85
     [Google Scholar]
170. Viveiros de Castro E. 2004. Exchanging perspectives: the transformation of objects into subjects in Amerindian cosmologies. Common Knowl 10:3463–84
     [Google Scholar]
171. Vygotsky LS. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
172. Wallerstein I. 1974. The Modern World-System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century New York: Academic
     [Google Scholar]
173. Watts C. 2007. From purification to mediation: overcoming artifactual ‘otherness’ with and in actor-network theory. J. Iber. Archaeol. 2007(9/10) 39–54
     [Google Scholar]
174. Watts C 2013. Relational Archaeologies: Humans, Animals, Things London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
175. Webmoor T, Witmore CL. 2008. Things are us! A commentary on human/things relations under the banner of a ‘social’ archaeology. Nor. Archaeol. Rev. 41:53–70
     [Google Scholar]
176. Weiner S. 2010. Microarchaeology: Beyond the Visible Archaeological Record Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
177. Weissner P. 1983. Style and social information in Kalahari San projectile points. Am. Antiq. 48:253–76
     [Google Scholar]
178. Witmore CL. 2004. On multiple fields. Between the material world and media: two cases from the Peloponnesus, Greece. Archaeol. Dialogues 11:2133–64
     [Google Scholar]
179. Witmore CL. 2007. Symmetrical archaeology: excerpts of a manifesto. World Archaeol 39:4546–62
     [Google Scholar]