Inverse Problems for Physics-Based Process Models

Literature Cited

1. Alexanderian A, Petra N, Stadler G, Ghattas O. 2014.. A-optimal design of experiments for infinite-dimensional Bayesian linear inverse problems with regularized ℓ₀-sparsification. . SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 36:(5):A212248
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
2. Becker R, Rannacher R. 2001.. An optimal control approach to a posteriori error estimation in finite element methods. . Acta Numer. 10::1102
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
3. Bernardo JM, Smith AFM. 1994.. Bayesian Theory. New York:: Wiley
4. Breidt J, Butler T, Estep D. 2011.. A measure-theoretic computational method for inverse sensitivity problems I: method and analysis. . SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 49:(5):183659
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
5. Brynjarsdóttir J, O'Hagan A. 2014.. Learning about physical parameters: the importance of model discrepancy. . Inverse Probl. 30:(11):114007
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
6. Bui-Thanh T, Ghattas O. 2014.. An analysis of infinite dimensional Bayesian inverse shape acoustic scattering and its numerical approximation. . SIAM J. Uncertain. Quantif. 2:(1):20322
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
7. Bunya S, Dietrich J, Westerink J, Ebersole B, Smith J, et al. 2010.. A high resolution coupled riverine flow, tide, wind, wind wave and storm surge model for southern Louisiana and Mississippi. Part I: model development and validation. . Mon. Weather Rev. 138::34577
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
8. Burger M, Lucka F. 2014.. Maximum a posteriori estimates in linear inverse problems with log-concave priors are proper Bayes estimators. . Inverse Probl. 30:(11):114004
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
9. Butler T, Estep D, Nishant P. 2023.. A Ramble Through Probability: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Measure Theory. Philadelphia:: SIAM. In press
10. Butler T, Estep D, Sandelin J. 2012.. A computational measure theoretic approach to inverse sensitivity problems II: a posteriori error analysis. . SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 50:(1):2245
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
11. Butler T, Estep D, Tavener S, Dawson C, Westerink J. 2014a.. A measure-theoretic computational method for inverse sensitivity problems III: multiple quantities of interest. . SIAM/ASA J. Uncertain. Quantif. 2:(1):174202. https://doi.org/10.1137/130930406
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
12. Butler T, Estep D, Tavener S, Wildey T, Dawson C, Graham L. 2014b.. Solving stochastic inverse problems using sigma-algebras on contour maps. . arXiv:1407.3851 [math.NA]
13. Butler T, Graham L, Estep D, Dawson C, Westerink J. 2015.. Definition and solution of a stochastic inverse problem for the Manning's n parameter field in hydrodynamic models. . Adv. Water Resour. 78::6079
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
14. Butler T, Jakeman J, Wildey T. 2018.. Combining push-forward measures and Bayes' rule to construct consistent solutions to stochastic inverse problems. . SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 40:(2):A9841011
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
15. Butler T, Wildey T, Yen TY. 2020.. Data-consistent inversion for stochastic input-to-output maps. . Inverse Probl. 36:(8):085015
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
16. Calder M, Craig C, Culley D, de Cani R, Donnelly CA, et al. 2018.. Computational modelling for decision-making: where, why, what, who and how. . R. Soc. Open Sci. 5:(6):172096
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
17. Calvetti D, Kaipio J, Somersalo E. 2014.. Inverse problems in the Bayesian framework. . Inverse Probl. 30:(11):110301
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
18. Carey V, Estep D, Tavener S. 2009.. A posteriori analysis and adaptive error control for multiscale operator decomposition solution of elliptic systems I: triangular systems. . SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 47:(1):74061
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
19. Chang J, Pollard D. 1997.. Conditioning as disintegration. . Stat. Neerl. 51::287317
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
20. Chaudhry JH, Burch N, Estep D. 2018.. Efficient distribution estimation and uncertainty quantification for elliptic problems on domains with stochastic boundaries. . SIAM/ASA J. Uncertain. Quantif. 6:(3):112750
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
21. Chaudhry JH, Estep D, Gunzburger M. 2017.. Exploration of efficient reduced-order modeling and a posteriori error estimation. . Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 111:(2):10322
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
22. Chi J. 2021.. Sliced inverse approach and domain recovery for stochastic inverse problems. PhD Thesis, Dep. Stat., Colo. State Univ., Fort Collins, CO:
    [Google Scholar]
23. Cockayne J, Oates C, Sullivan T, Girolami M. 2017.. Probabilistic numerical methods for PDE-constrained Bayesian inverse problems. . AIP Conf. Proc. 1853:(1):060001
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
24. Cotter S, Dashti M, Stuart A. 2010.. Approximation of Bayesian inverse problems. . SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 48::32245
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
25. Cui T, Marzouk YM, Willcox KE. 2016.. Scalable posterior approximations for large-scale Bayesian inverse problems via likelihood-informed parameter and state reduction. . J. Comput. Phys. 315::36387
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
26. Dietrich JC, Bunya S, Westerink JJ, Ebersole BA, Smith JM, et al. 2010.. A high resolution coupled riverine flow, tide, wind, wind wave and storm surge model for Southern Louisiana and Mississippi. Part II: synoptic description and analyses of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. . Mon. Weather Rev. 138::378404
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
27. Dietrich JC, Westerink JJ, Kennedy AB, Smith JM, Jensen RE, et al. 2011.. Hurricane Gustav (2008) waves and storm surge: hindcast, synoptic analysis and validation in Southern Louisiana. . Mon. Weather Rev. 139::2488522
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
28. Elfverson D, Estep D, Hellman F, Malqvist A. 2014.. Uncertainty quantification for approximate p-quantiles for physical models with stochastic inputs. . SIAM/ASA J. Uncertain. Quantif. 2::82650
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
29. Ernst O, Sprungk B, Starkloff H. 2014.. Bayesian inverse problems and Kalman filters. . In Extraction of Quantifiable Information from Complex Systems, ed. S Dahlke, W Dahmen, M Griebel, W Hackbusch, K Ritter , et al., pp. 13359 New York:: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
30. Estep D. 1995.. A posteriori error bounds and global error control for approximation of ordinary differential equations. . SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 32:(1):148
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
31. Estep D, Larson M, Williams R. 2000.. Estimating the error of numerical solutions of systems of reaction-diffusion equations. . Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 146:(696):1109
    [Google Scholar]
32. Estep D, Malqvist A, Tavener S. 2009a.. Nonparametric density estimation for randomly perturbed elliptic problems I: computational methods, a posteriori analysis, and adaptive error control. . SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 31::293559
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
33. Estep D, Malqvist A, Tavener S. 2009b.. Nonparametric density estimation for randomly perturbed elliptic problems II: applications and adaptive modeling. . Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 80::84667
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
34. Fitzpatrick B. 1991.. Bayesian analysis in inverse problems. . Inverse Probl. 7:(5):675
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
35. Fleming J, Fulcher C, Luettich R, Estrade B, Allen G, Winer H. 2008.. A real time storm surge forecasting system using ADCIRC. . In Estuarine and Coastal Modeling X, ed. M Spaulding , pp. 893912 Reston, VA:: ASCE
    [Google Scholar]
36. Galbally D, Fidkowski K, Willcox K, Ghattas O. 2010.. Nonlinear model reduction for uncertainty quantification in large-scale inverse problems. . Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 81::1581608
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
37. Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Dunson DB, Vehtari A, Rubin DB. 2013.. Bayesian Data Analysis. Boca Raton, FL:: Chapman and Hall/CRC, 3rd ed.
38. Goh J, Bingham D, Holloway JP, Grosskopf MJ, Kuranz CC, Rutter E. 2013.. Prediction and computer model calibration using outputs from multifidelity simulators. . Technometrics 55:(4):50112
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
39. Graham L, Butler T, Walsh S, Dawson C, Westerink J. 2017.. A measure-theoretic algorithm for estimating bottom friction in a coastal inlet: case study of Bay St. Louis during Hurricane Gustav (2008). . Mon. Weather Rev. 145:(3):92954
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
40. Graham L, Mattis S, Walsh S, Butler T, Pilosov M, McDougall D. 2020.. BET: Butler, Estep, Tavener method v3.0.0.. https://github.com/UT-CHG/BET
41. Grosskopf M, Bingham D, Adams M, Hawkins W, Perez-Nunez D. 2021.. Generalized computer model calibration for radiation transport simulation. . Technometrics 63::2739
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
42. Heikoop J, Johnson T, Birdsell K, Longmire P, Hickmott D, et al. 2014.. Isotropic evidence for reduction of anthropogenic hexavalent chromium in Los Alamos National Laboratory groundwater. . Chem. Geol. 373::19
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
43. Henderson D, Boys R, Wilkinson D. 2010.. Bayesian calibration of a stochastic kinetic computer model using multiple data sources. . Biometrics 66::24956
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
44. Higdon D, Gattiker J, Williams B, Rightley M. 2008.. Computer model calibration using high-dimensional output. . J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 103:(482):57083
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
45. Higdon D, Kennedy M, Cavendish J, Cafeo J, Ryne R. 2004.. Combining field data and computer simulations for calibration and prediction. . SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 26::44866
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
46. Hope M, Westerink J, Kennedy A, Kerr P, Dietrich J, et al. 2013.. Hindcast and validation of Hurricane Ike (2008) waves, forerunner, and storm surge. . J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 118::442460
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
47. Kennedy M, O'Hagan A. 2001.. Bayesian calibration of computer models. . J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 63:(3):42564
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
48. Loeppky J, Bingham D, Welch W. 2006.. Computer model calibration or tuning in practice. Rep. 221 , Univ. British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Can.:
49. Logg A, Mardal KA, Wells G 2012.. Automated Solution of Differential Equations by the Finite Element Method. New York:: Springer
50. Marzouk YM, Najm HN, Rahn LA. 2007.. Stochastic spectral methods for efficient Bayesian solution of inverse problems. . J. Comput. Phys. 224:(2):56086
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
51. Mattis S, Butler T, Dawson C, Estep D, Vessilinov V. 2015.. Parameter estimation and prediction for groundwater contamination based on measure theory. . Water Resourc. Res. 51::760829
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
52. Mattis S, Steffen K, Butler T, Dawson C, Estep D. 2022.. Learning quantities of interest from dynamical systems for observation-consistent inversion. . Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 388::114230
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
53. Mosegaard K, Tarantola A. 1995.. Monte Carlo sampling of solutions to inverse problems. . J. Geophys. Res. 100:(B7):1243147
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
54. Panchal J, Kalidindi S, McDowell D. 2013.. Key computational modeling issues in integrated computational materials engineering. . Comput. Aided Des. 45:(1):425
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
55. Plumlee M. 2017.. Bayesian calibration of inexact computer models. . J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 112:(519):127485
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
56. Robert CP. 2001.. The Bayesian Choice: From Decision-Theoretic Foundations to Computational Implementation. New York:: Springer, 2nd ed.
57. Sacks J, Welch W, Mitchell T, Wynn H. 1989.. Design and analysis of computer experiments. . Stat. Sci. 4:(4):40935
    [Google Scholar]
58. Stark PB, Tenorio L. 2010.. A primer of frequentist and Bayesian inference in inverse problems. . In Large-Scale Inverse Problems and Quantification of Uncertainty, ed. L Biegler, G Biros, O Ghattas, M Heinkenschloss, D Keyes , et al., pp. 932 New York:: Wiley
    [Google Scholar]
59. Stuart AM. 2010.. Inverse problems: a Bayesian perspective. . Acta Numer. 19::451559
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
60. Tarantola A. 2005.. Inverse Problem Theory and Methods for Model Parameter Estimation. Philadelphia: SIAM:
61. Tuo R, Wu J. 2015.. Efficient calibration for imperfect computer models. . Ann. Stat. 43:(6):233152
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
62. Tuo R, Wu J. 2016.. A theoretical framework for calibration in computer models: parametrization, estimation and convergence properties. . SIAM/ASA J. Uncertain. Quantif. 4:(1):76795
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
63. van der Vaart A. 1998.. Asymptotic Statistics. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
64. Westerink JJ, Luettich RA, Feyen JC, Atkinson JH, Dawson CN, et al. 2008.. A basin to channel scale unstructured grid hurricane storm surge model applied to southern Louisiana. . Mon. Weather Rev. 136::83364
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
65. Yang L. 2018.. Infinite dimensional stochastic inverse problems. PhD Thesis, Dep. Stat., Colo. State Univ., Fort Collins, CO:
    [Google Scholar]